Fix-fix Arch Approximate Static Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing an arch bridge for approximate stresses, particularly focusing on the fix-end moment under dead and live loads. The user struggles with underestimating moments using existing formulas and seeks an easy approximation for fix-fix conditions. They express a need for a solution that avoids finite element analysis due to accessibility issues with FE packages. MEXE and ARCHIE are mentioned as tools developed for quick assessments of arch bridges, with MEXE being a historical method and ARCHIE a modern software implementation. The conversation highlights the necessity for practical solutions in structural analysis without relying on complex modeling tools.
henie84
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey there,

i´m dealing with a problem when I´m trying to analyze an arch bridge for approximate stresses in the arch. The normal force is quite easy to get for such structure.

The problem I´m running into is the fix-end moment for the arch under both dead load and live load (live load is approximated as one-half span length uniform load). Obviously, the stiffness plays an key issue. Is there an easy approximation formula that would get me the moment assuming fix-fix condition.

The following one for half-sided uniform load

MLL= - w L 2/ 64

doesn´t really do the trick, since it grossly underestimates the moment at the opposite side support, thus underestimates the total stress in the arch.

And I don´t even have a formula for dead load moments.


Back to the topic of moment, assuming pin-pin condition only normal force gets tranferred into abutments, however, significant moment can develop withing the arch itself @ approximately 5/16L ... any good formula for estimating such moment?

I´ve searched multiple books, papers, etc but I haven´t had much luck.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The moment (ha ha pun intended) you bring bending into it, you should be treating your structure as a curved beam, not an arch.

If you are trying to do more than MEXE or ARCHIE then you will need FE analysis.
 
not sure what ARCHIE or MEXE is ... but the point is not to use FE analysis ... i can be doing 2D/3D FE models all day, not a problem, but I really need an approximate solution, because the FE packages are not available at locations where we are trying to implement this ...

worst case scenario i´ll have analyse 30-40 arch bridges and come out with span/height/load carrying capacity tables :-/ (here I run into the problem that I don't have that many as-builts)

not sure that I can treat an fix-fix arch 40m long, 10m high as a curved beam ...
 
not sure that I can treat an fix-fix arch 40m long, 10m high as a curved beam ...

Sur you can. That is what it is if it carries bending.

not sure what ARCHIE or MEXE is ... but the point is not to use FE analysis ... i can be doing 2D/3D FE models all day, not a problem, but I really need an approximate solution, because the FE packages are not available at locations where we are trying to implement this ...

That is what MEXE and ARCHIE were developed for.

MEXE was originally developed in pre computer days as a quick field method for assessing arch bridges for load carrying capacity. It is very quick and easy. There are computer implementations these days. There is a UK Department of Transport on the subject. If I remember correctly, it is also discussed in Picard - The Masonry Arch.



ARCHIE is a PC implementation of theory developed bz Prof Harvey, during his tenure at the University of Strathclyde. It is available commercially for a small fee. It performs a similar function to MEXE.
 
ok, i might have misunderstood what you meant by a curved beam, i was assuming a line element with small deflection angles :-)

Cool, I got to look up MEXE and ARCHIE then, especially MEXE sounds interesting to me. Thanks for the info.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top