Fortran Fixing Fortran DO Command Errors for Visual Fortran (f90)

  • Thread starter Thread starter zandria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fortran
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on resolving errors in a Visual Fortran program related to the DO loop statement. The user initially encounters two errors, which they trace back to the lack of variable declaration for "i." It is emphasized that the "implicit none" statement should remain in the code to enforce explicit variable declaration, preventing potential issues with undeclared variables. Removing this statement may lead to misleading compilations and runtime errors due to misspelled variable names. Properly defining all variables from the start is crucial for maintaining code integrity and avoiding future complications.
zandria
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am working with visual Fortran (f90 I believe)

I have the following program and it says that I have 2 errors. I have narrowed it down to having something to do with my loop statement in bold. Is there something wrong that I'm not getting?

program exercise1

implicit none

integer :: limit, f1, f2, f3
read*, limit

f1 = 1
if (limit >= 1) then
print*, f1
end if

f2 = 1
if (limit >= 2) print*, f2

do i= 3, limit
f3 = f1 + f2
print*, f3
f1 = f2
f2 = f3
end do



end program exercise1
 
Technology news on Phys.org
nevermind, figured it out. I did not define "i" as a variable in my list of integers
 
Remove (delete) the statement: implicit none
 
DO NOT REMOVE THE IMPLICIT NONE STATEMENT

Having that in forces the user to explicitly define their variables. Removing that statement to get a program to compile will nearly always cause problems later down the line.

Simply put: fix it right the first time.
 
Without the IMPLICIT NONE, if you mis-spell the name of a variable once, the compiler doesn't catch it for you, as an undeclared variable. Instead, it cheerfully allocates a new variable with that name, which has no connection with the variable you meant to use. Your program compiles "successfully," but when you run it, it either produces incorrect results or crashes with a run-time error that can be very difficult to track down.
 
Dear Peeps I have posted a few questions about programing on this sectio of the PF forum. I want to ask you veterans how you folks learn program in assembly and about computer architecture for the x86 family. In addition to finish learning C, I am also reading the book From bits to Gates to C and Beyond. In the book, it uses the mini LC3 assembly language. I also have books on assembly programming and computer architecture. The few famous ones i have are Computer Organization and...
I have a quick questions. I am going through a book on C programming on my own. Afterwards, I plan to go through something call data structures and algorithms on my own also in C. I also need to learn C++, Matlab and for personal interest Haskell. For the two topic of data structures and algorithms, I understand there are standard ones across all programming languages. After learning it through C, what would be the biggest issue when trying to implement the same data...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Back
Top