Flat start for power systems design

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a "flat start" in power systems design, particularly in relation to simulations and the initial conditions required before running fault analyses. Participants seek to clarify the meaning and implications of this term within the context of power system modeling.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the purpose of a "flat start" in power system simulations.
  • Another participant expresses unfamiliarity with the term "flat start," prompting further clarification.
  • Some participants propose that a "flat start" means setting all internal voltages to 0V, including across capacitors.
  • It is suggested that the system should be allowed to reach equilibrium before applying faults to ensure that any changes observed are due to the faults themselves.
  • One participant explains that in load flow calculations, a "flat start" refers to an initial guess of bus voltages set to 1.0 per unit at zero degrees angle, which is considered least likely to fail if no prior solution is known.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the initial guess does not affect the final answer unless it fails to find a solution, and that equilibrium is necessary to distinguish fault effects from initial condition errors.
  • There is a mention of the difference between static analysis and transient analysis in studying faults, with a note on the terminology used in load flow calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the term "flat start," and while some agree on its implications for equilibrium in simulations, others highlight potential differences in terminology and understanding. The discussion remains unresolved regarding a unified definition and application of "flat start."

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the understanding of "flat start" may depend on specific simulation contexts, such as power system analyzers versus plant simulators, indicating potential limitations in the applicability of definitions across different systems.

honyeehong8692
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello all, would like to ask what seems to be a general rule when designing power systems.

In the power system design program which I just started to use. It is advised that:

For every simulation to be run, it is best to have a "flat start" before running any faults.

I'm not too sure of the purpose of having a flat start to the system. Would like an explanation.. Please and thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What do you mean by a "flat start"? I have never heard this term before.
 
I expect that they mean that all internal voltages should be set to 0V (including the voltages across any capacitors).
 
Let it run a while to get everything settled out at equilibrium .

Like OldEngr, i never heard that term.
But i do know from simulating that you must start from equilibrium, not some assumed set of initial conditions.

That way you know that when you applied your fault, whatever changed was a result of your fault.
 
In load flow calculations, "flat start" refers to the initial guess of bus voltages. I.e. All voltages 1.0 per unit at zero degrees angle.

After the initial guess, the program iterates to an actual solution. The initial guess has no influence on the final answer (unless it fails to find a solution at all.)

You don't have to use a flat start, it is merely the initial guess least likely to fail if you have no idea what the solution will be.
 
anorlunda said:
After the initial guess, the program iterates to an actual solution. The initial guess has no influence on the final answer (unless it fails to find a solution at all.)

You don't have to use a flat start, it is merely the initial guess least likely to fail if you have no idea what the solution will be.
If he's applying faults the program needs to be at equilibrium , else how to know what part of the transient comes from the fault vs from a bad initial guess?

Might be just terminology here , my simulation experience was on a plant simulator not a power system analyzer.
 
The solution to which I refer is the initial steady state. Short circuits ( AKA faults)are then studied with static analysis or transient analysis, depending on the purpose of your study.

In the jargon, "load flow" is a static calculation. In transient simulations, we do a load flow of the grid each time step.

Power plant simulators huh? What fun. I spent 17 years building those. Had a great time.
 
anorlunda said:
The solution to which I refer is the initial steady state. Short circuits ( AKA faults)are then studied with static analysis or transient analysis, depending on the purpose of your study.

In the jargon, "load flow" is a static calculation. In transient simulations, we do a load flow of the grid each time step.

Power plant simulators huh? What fun. I spent 17 years building those. Had a great time.
Ahhhh so you know both worldsThanks for the clarification !

old jim
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
787
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K