B What Does it Mean When We Say the Universe is 'Flat'?

AI Thread Summary
The term "flat universe" refers to the spatial geometry of the universe, indicating that it is spatially flat in the sense of Euclidean geometry. This means that if you draw two parallel lines, they will remain equidistant and never converge or diverge. The concept does not imply a literal flatness like a sheet of paper, as the universe has three spatial dimensions. Instead, it describes the overall curvature of space on a cosmic scale, where spacelike slices of constant time are flat. Understanding this distinction is crucial for grasping the nature of the universe's geometry.
MikeeMiracle
Messages
396
Reaction score
313
TL;DR Summary
Flat Universe Definition
When we say the universe is "flat," do we mean:

1) If you could hypothetically "zoom" out to the edge of the universe it would appear roughly as a flat like a sheet of paper with local fluctuations / bumps to indicate the presence of matter.

2) If we draw 2 parallel lines from 1 location they will never move towards each other or further apart? (Assuming discounting the effect of cosmic inflation and curvatures caused by matter itself?)

I am assuming it is the 2nd option?

Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
MikeeMiracle said:
Summary:: Flat Universe Definition

When we say the universe is "flat," do we mean:

1) If you could hypothetically "zoom" out to the edge of the universe it would appear roughly as a flat like a sheet of paper with local fluctuations / bumps to indicate the presence of matter.

2) If we draw 2 parallel lines from 1 location they will never move towards each other or further apart? (Assuming discounting the effect of cosmic inflation and curvatures caused by matter itself?)

I am assuming it is the 2nd option?

Thanks

Essentially it's number 2). Number 1) is simply absurd. The universe has 3 spatial dimensions.
 
You know, in all honesty number 1 sounds absurd to me too but my time on this forum has demonstrated to me that just because initially appears to be absurd and /or completely counter intuative, that does not necesarily mean it is wrong, hence why I felt the need to post asking for a clarification.
 
MikeeMiracle said:
When we say the universe is "flat,"

We mean it is spatially flat. In other words, spacelike slices of constant time, where "time" here means time in the standard FRW coordinates used in cosmology, are flat Euclidean 3-spaces.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top