Flawed Proof: x + y = y in Algebra - Spivak Calculus (1994) Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrdunaway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Spivak
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the flaw in a mathematical proof that incorrectly concludes 2 equals 1 by assuming x equals y. The critical error occurs when dividing by (x - y), which equals zero under the assumption that x = y, making the division invalid. Participants highlight that instead of dividing, one should factor the equation to properly analyze the solutions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing when division by zero occurs and suggests alternative methods for solving equations without losing potential solutions. The thread concludes with appreciation for the insights shared.
jrdunaway
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2. What is wrong with the following "proof"? Let x = y. Then
x2 =xy,
x2 - y2 =xy - y ,
(x + y)(x -y) = y(x - y),
x + y = y,
2y = y,
2= 1.

Homework Equations



It's obvious that x + y =/= y, but I do not know how to "prove" this, i.e. which proof from algebra is applicable here. My hunch is that it is the Distributive Property?

The Attempt at a Solution



I honestly am not sure where to start with this. All I can see is that dividing (x-y) out from step 3 to step 4 is what causes the inequality.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi jrdunaway welcome to pf! :smile:
jrdunaway said:
(x + y)(x -y) = y(x - y),
x + y = y,

All I can see is that dividing (x-y) out from step 3 to step 4 is what causes the inequality.

that's right! :smile:

if x = y, that means that you divided by 0, which isn't allowed

so (if x = y) that step is not valid
 
jrdunaway said:

Homework Statement



2. What is wrong with the following "proof"? Let x = y. Then
x2 =xy,
x2 - y2 =xy - y ,
You mean xy- y2 on the right.

But you still can't divide by 0.

(x + y)(x -y) = y(x - y),
x + y = y,
2y = y,
2= 1.

Homework Equations



It's obvious that x + y =/= y, but I do not know how to "prove" this, i.e. which proof from algebra is applicable here. My hunch is that it is the Distributive Property?

The Attempt at a Solution



I honestly am not sure where to start with this. All I can see is that dividing (x-y) out from step 3 to step 4 is what causes the inequality.
5*0= 0 and 3*0= 0 so 5*0= 3*0. It does not follow that 5= 3!
 
jrdunaway said:
What is wrong with the following "proof"? Let x = y. Then
x2 =xy,
x2 - y2 =xy - y ,
(x + y)(x -y) = y(x - y),
x + y = y,

What instead should have been done was

(x+y)(x-y)=y(x-y)

(x+y)(x-y)-y(x-y)=0

(x-y)(x+y-y)=0
(factorized out (x-y) from both factors)

(x-y)x=0

So either x-y=0, thus x=y, or x=0

This is common practice when solving quadratics and such. If you end up with x^2+x=0 for example, you don't divide through by x to obtain x+1=0 because then you lose the solution of x=0. What you instead do is factorize into the form x(x+1)=0 which allows you to find all the solutions.
 
PhysicsForums,

you guys have exceeded my expectations! Thank you! I'll be back soon I'm sure :)
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top