Flexibility - multiple methods for solutions?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Yh Hoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flexibility Multiple
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the flexibility of methods for solving mathematical equations, particularly quadratic equations and those involving surds. Participants explore how different approaches can yield varying numbers of solutions and the implications of these methods on the validity of the solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that solving the equation x + 3√x - 18 = 0 using different methods can lead to different numbers of solutions, raising questions about the nature of the equations.
  • In Method 1, a participant treats x as (√x)², leading to a quadratic equation in terms of √x, resulting in one valid solution (x=9) while discarding a negative root.
  • In Method 2, rearranging the equation and squaring both sides yields two solutions (x=9 or x=36), but the participant questions why x=36 is not a valid solution in the original equation.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of substituting back into the original equation to verify solutions, highlighting that squaring both sides can introduce extraneous solutions.
  • It is mentioned that squaring both sides of an equation may produce a larger solution set than the original, particularly when dealing with real numbers and the properties of square roots.
  • Some participants discuss the necessity of verbal reasoning in algebra, suggesting that manipulating symbols alone may not suffice for valid solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the methods used to solve the equation, particularly regarding the validity of solutions obtained through squaring. There is no consensus on the best approach or the nature of the solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the solutions must be non-negative, and there are discussions about the limitations of squaring equations and the assumptions involved in each method.

Yh Hoo
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Flexibility -- multiple methods for solutions?

I found that for some mathematical equations, for example quadratic equations or other equations where f(x)=0, the solutions for f(x)=0 could be 2 i we solve certain way and only 1 out of 2 if we use another method, somethings like changing the nature of the equations.
For example, consider an equation involving surd.
x + 3√x - 18 = 0

Method 1
If i solve this by treating x as (√x)[itex]^{2}[/itex], the new equation would be a quadratic eqt in terms of √x.
(√x)[itex]^{2}[/itex] + 3√x - 18 = 0
∴By applying the quadratic equation formula, √x = 3 or -6 ,where √x=-6 should be ignore right? so we got only 1 solution which is x=9 while -6 is prohibited , meaning can't be substituted even in the original equation!

Method 2
Now if i rearrange the equation so that the term with surd is on one side and without surd is on the other side, we gt
3√x = 18 - x
square both side, we gt
9x = (18 - x)[itex]^{2}[/itex]
x - 45x + 324 = 0
Finally by quadratic equation formula,
x= 9 or 36
but somehow the 36 here is not a solution to the original equation. This is the place i wonder why even it is not a solution we still can get x=36 when f(x)=0 ??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


this is not a homework but out of my curiosity! anyone please help me.
 


In method 1 you have solved for the square root of x

In method 2 you have solved for x.

Do you see the difference?
 


Yh Hoo said:
I found that for some mathematical equations, for example quadratic equations or other equations where f(x)=0, the solutions for f(x)=0 could be 2 i we solve certain way and only 1 out of 2 if we use another method, somethings like changing the nature of the equations.
For example, consider an equation involving surd.
x + 3√x - 18 = 0

Method 1
If i solve this by treating x as (√x)[itex]^{2}[/itex], the new equation would be a quadratic eqt in terms of √x.
(√x)[itex]^{2}[/itex] + 3√x - 18 = 0
∴By applying the quadratic equation formula, √x = 3 or -6 ,where √x=-6 should be ignore right? so we got only 1 solution which is x=9 while -6 is prohibited , meaning can't be substituted even in the original equation!

Method 2
Now if i rearrange the equation so that the term with surd is on one side and without surd is on the other side, we gt
3√x = 18 - x
square both side, we gt
9x = (18 - x)[itex]^{2}[/itex]
x - 45x + 324 = 0
Finally by quadratic equation formula,
x= 9 or 36
but somehow the 36 here is not a solution to the original equation. This is the place i wonder why even it is not a solution we still can get x=36 when f(x)=0 ??



So, after all, you got ONLY one actual real solution to the original equation, didn't you?

Both methods above restrict the possible real solutions, which MUST be non-negative, so in this case in just the same as

the good 'ol age-problems in junior high school, when one had to find out the ages of two people and sometimes

one got a negative solution, which had to be discarded as it didn't fit...

When rooting-squaring, the secret is simple: do whatever you will, but at the end substitute in the original equation

to be sure

DonAntonio
 


Yh Hoo said:
Method 2
3√x = 18 - x
square both side, we gt
9x = (18 - x)[itex]^{2}[/itex]

Squaring both sides of an equation may produce an equation which has a larger solution set than the original equation. This comes from the fact that [itex](\sqrt{x})^2[/itex] is not always [itex]x[/itex]. If you dealing only with the real numbers then [itex](\sqrt{-6})^2[/itex] is not defined while [itex]-6[/itex] is.

In general [itex](x^a)^b[/itex] is not always equal to [itex]x^{ab}[/itex].

One of the pleasing powers of mathematics is that it allows us to solve problems by manipulating symbols without any verbal thinking. However, this power always falls slightly short of eliminating the need for verbal thoughts altogether. You have discovered some examples where this is the case. When students are introduced to algebra they often expect to write everything down as lists of symbols and not use words. Some teacher encourage this since it makes papers easier to grade. The truth is that you can't really do algebra in valid manner without writing some words here and there to explain your steps.
 


Stephen Tashi said:
Squaring both sides of an equation may produce an equation which has a larger solution set than the original equation. This comes from the fact that [itex](\sqrt{x})^2[/itex] is not always [itex]x[/itex]. If you dealing only with the real numbers then [itex](\sqrt{-6})^2[/itex] is not defined while [itex]-6[/itex] is.

In general [itex](x^a)^b[/itex] is not always equal to [itex]x^{ab}[/itex].

One of the pleasing powers of mathematics is that it allows us to solve problems by manipulating symbols without any verbal thinking. However, this power always falls slightly short of eliminating the need for verbal thoughts altogether. You have discovered some examples where this is the case. When students are introduced to algebra they often expect to write everything down as lists of symbols and not use words. Some teacher encourage this since it makes papers easier to grade. The truth is that you can't really do algebra in valid manner without writing some words here and there to explain your steps.


Perhaps one should add that "in general" above refers to complex exponentiation and\or non-positive base (and, thus, again

complex stuff), since indeed [itex]\left(x^a\right)^b=x^{ab}[/itex] whenever the basis is positive and the exponent are real numbers.

DonAntonio
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K