Florine with water and aqueous Fe2+

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samurai33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aqueous Water
AI Thread Summary
Florine can oxidize water, producing oxygen and hydrogen fluoride. When reacting with aqueous Fe2+, water is oxidized to generate hydrogen peroxide and OF2, indicating that the reaction is not feasible. This process also results in the oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+. The difference in Florine's reaction with water versus its reaction with Fe2+ raises questions about the underlying mechanisms. Clarifying these reactions is essential for understanding Florine's behavior as an oxidizing agent.
Samurai33
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Florine can oxidize water to oxygen and hydrogen floride.

When reacts with aqueous Fe2+, water is being oxidized to give hydrogen peroxide and some OF2,(due to the strong oxidizing power of F2?) so the reaction is unsuitable to carried out, right? That means meanwhile Fe2+ is also oxidized to Fe3+, right?

But this time why Florine reacts differently with water not giving oxygen and hydrogen floride?

Please help me to solve each ?, clearing my concept, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
please...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Chemistry How do we interpret the steps in the algorithm to balance a redox equation?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Is Sodium Metal the Reducing Agent in Its Reaction with Water?
Replies
3
Views
5K
Electrochemical Cells (involving partial pressures and pH)
Replies
7
Views
6K
Corrosion and galvanic corrosion (Basic level)
Replies
9
Views
3K
What will be the product of this organic reaction?
Replies
28
Views
5K
Corrosion & pH: Explaining Observations of Iron Nail
Replies
1
Views
4K
[Chem] Ions' States of Matter when not in solution
Replies
1
Views
6K
Nitric acid and magnesium reaction, slow gas production
Replies
1
Views
10K
Lewis Acid/Base Chemistry in formation of Sulfuric Acid
Replies
3
Views
5K
How Do Acids and Bases Ionize in Aqueous Solutions?
Replies
3
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top