Flowfield visualization of a gun shooting underwater high speed video

AI Thread Summary
The experiment showcased the visual effects of a gun firing underwater, revealing that the muzzle blast is not spherical as initially expected. The discussion included a participant expressing interest in the findings and confirming their involvement in the video. Another user offered assistance with embedding videos, highlighting the ease of sharing visual content. The overall tone was supportive and engaging, with participants appreciating the unique perspective on underwater ballistics. The experiment provides valuable insights into the physics of underwater firearm discharge.
MrPennywhistl
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I ran this experiment to find out what a gun would look like while shooting under water. Turns out to be quite interesting. The muzzle blast is NOT spherical as I first assumed.



Regards,

Mrpennywhistle
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's really cool! Are you the guy in the video?
 
Yep, that's me.
 
Kk. I'd link a video of my own, but I don't think the physics of my cat being spun around on a hardwood floor is that interesting.
 
MrPennywhistl said:
I ran this experiment to find out what a gun would look like while shooting under water. Turns out to be quite interesting. The muzzle blast is NOT spherical as I first assumed.



Regards,

Mrpennywhistle


Cool. Thanks for posting. By the way you can embeed videos directly:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eUlpPY96Ok
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, the magic of embedding. I'm an idiot.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Filming a passing road sign: speed vs bumpiness
Replies
16
Views
2K
Now, for the title:What's the Bullet Speed?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Gaussian gun: Where does the extra kinetic energy come from?
Replies
11
Views
5K
Why speed limits don't matter
Replies
34
Views
2K
Would changing the weight of gun components affect recoil?
Replies
43
Views
10K
Understanding Momentum Conservation in Isolated Systems
Replies
19
Views
6K
Electrical How to use capacitors in a Solenoid circuit
Replies
32
Views
8K
B Hopf fibration, Bloch sphere and quantum rotations - interactive site
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Can an Object Exceed the Speed of Light?
Replies
12
Views
2K
Optimizing High Speed Transit for Comfort and Safety: A Scientific Approach
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top