Fluid Flow: Principal Rates of Deformation/Principal Axes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the principal rates of deformation and principal axes for a flow defined by u = (x,y) and v = 0, adhering to the continuity equation with constant density. Participants clarify that the continuity condition should be expressed as du_i/dx_i = 0. One user confirms the correctness of the initial approach to determining principal directions, noting that the flow represents a 2-D shear scenario. They calculate the principal values and directions using traditional methods, yielding principal values of +/- du/dy. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the continuity equation in fluid flow analysis.
jhuleea
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I've been stumped on this problem for over a month. Any guidance would alleviate my overwhelming frustration. Here is the original problem statement:

Find the principal rates of deformation and principal axes for the flow given by: u = (x,y) and v = 0, satisfying the continuity equation (density = rho = constant)
\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_i} = 0​

Attached to this post is my attempt to work out the solution. I'm not sure how to proceed on, so your help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • HW3 p2.jpg
    HW3 p2.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 730
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
jhuleea said:
Hi all,
Find the principal rates of deformation and principal axes for the flow given by: u = (x,y) and v = 0, satisfying the continuity equation (density = rho = constant)
I guess that continuity should be du_i/dx_i=0 instead of div(u_3)=0.

Anyhew, your solution seems correct up till and including the principal directions (with the note that u=u(y) only, i.e. 2-D shear flow). When I calculate the principal values and directions in the old fashion way (as eigenvalues/eigenvectors of the strain rate tensor), I get the same directions, but principal values are +/- du/dy.

Cheers //Rope
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top