Fluid Mechanics Internal Flow Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the pressure drop per unit length in a circular pipe with a diameter of 6 cm at a Reynolds number of 10,000, indicating turbulent flow. Participants note that the Poiseuille flow friction factor is not applicable due to the turbulent nature of the flow, and emphasize the need for additional information, such as density, viscosity, and relative roughness, to determine the friction factor accurately. It is confirmed that for laminar flow, the friction factor can be calculated using the Reynolds number, while turbulent flow requires knowledge of roughness, viscosity, and density. The relationship between frictional losses and flow velocity is also highlighted, indicating that flow rate is crucial for calculations. The conversation underscores the complexity of fluid mechanics in turbulent conditions.
thrillhouse86
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I know that it is forbidden to post homework questions here, this is a question off a past exam, so I'm hope asking this is Kosher.

A question says:
"For a circular pipe of 6cm diameter, what is the expected pressure drop per unit length due to frictional losses, at a Reynolds number of 10000"

Obviously this is a turbulent flow question, so the Poiseulle flow friction factor can't be used. But given that no density, viscosity or friction factor information is given (I know density and viscosity are buried in the Reynolds number) how the hell do you work this out ?

Does anyone have any ideas ? because I'm starting to think that some additional information was left off ...

Also - can someone verify this for me:
For Laminar flow you can work out the friction factor just with knowledge of the Reynolds number
For Turbulent flow you need to know the roughness, viscosity & density to work out pressure drops

Cheers,
Thrillhouse
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thrillhouse86 said:
Hey all,

I know that it is forbidden to post homework questions here, this is a question off a past exam, so I'm hope asking this is Kosher.

A question says:
"For a circular pipe of 6cm diameter, what is the expected pressure drop per unit length due to frictional losses, at a Reynolds number of 10000"

Obviously this is a turbulent flow question, so the Poiseulle flow friction factor can't be used. But given that no density, viscosity or friction factor information is given (I know density and viscosity are buried in the Reynolds number) how the hell do you work this out ?

Does anyone have any ideas ? because I'm starting to think that some additional information was left off ...

The friction factor for turbulent flow is dependent on the relative roughness as well, so you will need to know that.

The frictional losses are proportional to the velocity squared. So you'll need to know the flowrate as well.

CS
 
thrillhouse86 said:
Also - can someone verify this for me:
For Laminar flow you can work out the friction factor just with knowledge of the Reynolds number
For Turbulent flow you need to know the roughness, viscosity & density to work out pressure drops

For laminar flow, yes, you can use f = 64/Re

For turbulent flow you need the relative roughness and Reynold's number.

Note that the Reynold's number can use either the dynamic viscosity and density or just the kinematic viscosity (both need the velocity and diameter though).

CS
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top