[Fluid mechanics] Navier-Stokes and Hagen-Poiseuille

AI Thread Summary
The Hagen-Poiseuille equation is not applicable for free-falling fluids, as it requires a stationary solid pipe wall, which does not exist in this scenario. For vertical flows with varying diameters, the Navier-Stokes equations are more suitable to describe the behavior of viscous incompressible jets. The discussion also highlights an experiment aimed at demonstrating the limitations of the Bernoulli equation for viscous liquids compared to low-viscosity scenarios. The participants are uncertain about the appropriate viscosity to use in their calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a proper understanding of fluid dynamics principles when dealing with varying flow conditions.
ChaoY
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can the Hagen-Poiseuille equation be used for a vertical flow in the water tab or any flow that has circular cross-sections with varying diameters? If not, how can the Navier-Stokes equations or any other equations be used to describe a viscous incompressible free-falling vertical jet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are your thoughts on how to approach this problem? What is the order of magnitude of the viscosity you are considering?
 
I honestly don't know what viscosity we should use yet. We're preparing a little experiment to show that Bernoulli equation can be used to calculate velocity for liquid with low viscosity. We also want to calculate the flow rate of the jet this time with viscous liquid. The idea is to show that the Bernoulli equation becomes less effective. Now we're wondering if we could use the Hagen-Poiseuille equation to do the job instead this time considering the viscosity. Do you know if this equation still works if the circular cross section varies from two points?
 
ChaoY said:
I honestly don't know what viscosity we should use yet. We're preparing a little experiment to show that Bernoulli equation can be used to calculate velocity for liquid with low viscosity. We also want to calculate the flow rate of the jet this time with viscous liquid. The idea is to show that the Bernoulli equation becomes less effective. Now we're wondering if we could use the Hagen-Poiseuille equation to do the job instead this time considering the viscosity. Do you know if this equation still works if the circular cross section varies from two points?
If the fluid is in free fall, the hagen poiseulle equation doesn't apply because there is no stationary solid pipe wall.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top