At what distance does a seaplane's boundary layer transition to turbulence?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance from the leading edge of a seaplane's fuselage where the boundary layer transitions to turbulence, using the Reynolds number. The user attempts to determine this distance by setting the Reynolds number to 500,000 for turbulent flow and solving for the characteristic length L. They calculate L to be approximately 0.511 feet using viscosity and density values for air at 45°F, but find a discrepancy with a textbook answer of 0.295 feet. The user seeks clarification on their calculations and whether any assumptions may have been overlooked. The thread highlights the importance of accurate calculations and assumptions in fluid dynamics.
Brian T
Messages
130
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement


A seaplane flies at 100 mph through air at 45 *F. At what distance from the leading edge of the underside of the fuselage does the boundary layer transition to turbulence?

Homework Equations


Re = pvL/u
Re is Reynolds number
p (rho) is the density
V is the characteristic velocity
L is the characteristic length
u (mu) is the viscosity

The Attempt at a Solution


For turbulent flow (as said by my prof and the book), Re > 500000. So to find out when it transitions to turbulence, set Re to 500000 and solve for the characteric length L.

Solving for L, L = (Re)(u)/(p)(v)

From the appendix, the viscosity of air at 45*F is u = 3.66 x 10^-7 (lbf) (s) /ft^2 and p =. 00245 slug/ft^3. V is 100 mph which becomes 146.666 ft/s. Plugging these in, and Re = 500000, I get am answer of .511 ft.

The book, however, says the answer is. 295 ft. Can anyone help me out? I believe the calculation is correct as I ran it several times, but is there something I'm doing wrong or an assumption I'm missing? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show us the calculation, including the manipulation of the units.

Chet
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top