Fluids Problem: Is there a Typo?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BryMan92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluids
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a potential typo in a fluids problem related to the definition of L. The user questions whether the term Poil*G*L should actually be Poil*G*l/2, suggesting confusion about the measurement reference point. Responses clarify that the drop of l/2 occurs in water, while the rise in oil should be measured as a full l due to the different fluid densities. It is emphasized that pressure should be measured from a known point, like the top of the tank, accounting for both fluids. The user ultimately resolves their confusion by reviewing the problem more thoroughly.
BryMan92
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
1/2/3. Homework Statement and equations

Hi everyone,

So, I have a fluids problem to do and I think there may be a slight typo or maybe I am missing something. The image of the problem is attached.

So, the only problem I have is how L is defined. Since L is defined from below the zero line, shouldn't Poil*G*L, instead be written Poil*G*l/2? To me, it seems the system drops l/2 then rises L.

Perhaps, I am missing something...

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • problem statement.png
    problem statement.png
    22.2 KB · Views: 465
  • ;ol.png
    ;ol.png
    24.3 KB · Views: 506
Physics news on Phys.org
BryMan92 said:
1/2/3. Homework Statement and equations

Hi everyone,

So, I have a fluids problem to do and I think there may be a slight typo or maybe I am missing something. The image of the problem is attached.

So, the only problem I have is how L is defined. Since L is defined from below the zero line, shouldn't Poil*G*L, instead be written Poil*G*l/2? To me, it seems the system drops l/2 then rises L.

Perhaps, I am missing something...

Thanks!
As you say, the system drops l/2, but that drop is in water. Hence the +l/2 term in the expression containing ρwater.

Then the rise of l is entirely in oil, so there should be a full l, not l/2, accompanying the ρoil term.

Hope that helps.
 
But, if the system has a net drop of l/2 how can the oil raise a full l? Do I not measure from the zero point, or do I have to measure from the change in height of the whole system?

Additionally, at the zero line point in t, was l/2 already above the 0 line? If so, then this would make sense. Thanks for the help!
 
It's best to measure from some point where you already know what the pressure is. Since we know the pressure is Patm = 1 atm at the top of the tank, that is where they have chosen to measure from.

So measure the change in height from the top of the tank -- but you have to account for the fact that there are two fluids, so you take the change in depth for the water and then add the change in depth for the oil.
 
I got it thanks! I just had to run through it a but more thoroughly. My professor believes that doing a problem justifies as teaching.

Cheers!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top