Flux in Moderator vs Flux in fuel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the differences in neutron flux shapes between moderators and fuel in thermal reactors. The fission neutron spectrum is described by the equation y=e^-x*sinh(sqrt(x)), while the slowing down of neutrons is proportional to 1/E. The thermal neutron spectrum is characterized by (E*exp(-E/kt))/T^(3/2). It is noted that the neutron flux in the fuel encompasses the full spectrum, while the moderator flux lacks significant portions of the fission spectrum. Additionally, thermal flux in the fuel decreases radially due to self-shielding effects.
sandon
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
I was reading about different flux shapes, and it depicted the the shape of the fission neutron spectrum to be in the shape of y=e^-x*sinh(sqrt(x)), where y is the spectrum and x is the energy in MeV.

note: put that equation into wolfram for easy visualization

Then it depicted the slowing down of neutrons neutron flux to be proportional to 1/E

Finally it gave the neutron spectrum of thermal neutron to be proportional to
(E*exp(-E/kt))/T^(3/2)

See attached image for full neutron spectrum

My question is how does the shape of the neutron flux in the moderator differ from the shape of the neutron flux in the fuel.

My first thoughts were neutron flux in the fuel is the full spectrum of the attached image, and the flux in the moderator does not contain as much of the fission spectrum. I can't see any other differences, but the question wants a clear indication of difference between the fuel spectrum and moderator spectrum, both dependent on energy.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    23.9 KB · Views: 568
Engineering news on Phys.org
The fast flux is typically about 3x thermal flux in a thermal reactor.

The fission neutrons are produced with a spectrum. About 8 to 10% of fissions in a thermal reactor occur due to fast fissions of U-238.

The thermal flux in the fuel falls off radially into the fuel due to self-shielding, i.e., the fissions and reasonance absorptions diminish the neutron flux penetrates the fuel.

I will try to find a reference on the neutron spectum in an LWR.

Ref: http://meetingsandconferences.com/physor2012/Workshops/9.SFR-physics.pdf (third page)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top