Focal length of diffraction grating for recip. dispersion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the concept of focal length in relation to diffraction gratings. It clarifies that diffraction gratings do not have a defined focal length like lenses do, which complicates the calculation of linear reciprocal dispersion. The equation for reciprocal dispersion, Rd = [Df]-1, suggests a misunderstanding since 'f' does not apply to gratings. Participants emphasize the importance of clearly defining the problem and variables before attempting calculations. Ultimately, while focal length is not applicable, dispersion can still be calculated for diffraction gratings.
magnesium12
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What would the focal length be of a diffraction grating if the set up is a laser placed 1 m from the 0 order diffraction?
Would it be the distance from the grating to the laser or the distance from the grating to the image?

Homework Equations


1/f = 1/o + 1/i
Rd = [Df]-1
D=[sina + sinb]/λcosb
sina = 0

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no such things as a focal length for a diffraction grating. What makes you think there is ?
 
I assumed there was because I need to calculate the linear reciprocal dispersion of a first and second order diffraction and the formula is Rd = [Df]-1 where f is focal length (in my notes).
Is it possible to find a linear reciprocal dispersion for a diffraction grating at all?
 
Perhaps you should start with a complete and concise problem statement with all the variables clearly described. And then the relevant equations should establish relationships between those variables. By the time that's sorted out the problem is a mathematical problem. In the solution attempt you try to manipulate the relationships until the quantity that is asked for is expressed uniquely in terms of the given data.

There is such a thing as dispersion for a grating, so don't despair :smile:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top