Focal Length Problem: -30cm Converging/Diverging Lens

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the focal length of a lens with one concave and one convex side, using the lens maker's formula. The given parameters include a concave radius of curvature of 5 cm and a convex radius of 7.5 cm, with the refractive index of glass at 1.5. The initial calculation yielded a positive focal length, which contradicts the expected negative value indicating a diverging lens. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly applying the sign convention for radii, noting that the concave side should be treated as negative. Ultimately, the correct focal length should be -30 cm, confirming the lens is indeed diverging.
Chase11
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A lens made of glass has one concave side with a radius of curvature of 5 cm, and one convex side with a raduis of curvature of 7.5 cm. What is the focal length of the lens? Is this a converging or diverging lens?

Homework Equations


nglass=1.5
nair=1.0
(1/f)=(n-1)[(1/R1)+(1/R2)
R1=5 cm
R2=7.5 cm

The Attempt at a Solution


1/f=(1.5-1)[(1/5cm)+(1/7.5cm)] = .5(7.5cm+5cm/.375cm) = 16.667
So f=1/16.667=.06cm

The answer is supposed to be -30 cm and diverging. I have done a lot of similar problems right, I don't understand what I keep doing wrong on this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check the sign convention.
 
I thought it had something to do with that, but I honestly don't know where to change the sign. Is R2 supposed to be -7.5 because it is convex?
 
I'm getting 30 cm now, but this answer is supposed to be negative. Why would my answer come out positive?
 
Concave means negative radius and convex means positive one.
 
Chase11 said:
I'm getting 30 cm now, but this answer is supposed to be negative. Why would my answer come out positive?
... impossible to say without you show your calculation.
You probably misplaced a minus sign...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top