Hi everyone,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have a question about the application of the Fock operator when we want to optimize, for example, an atomic orbital written as a product of Slater Orbitals.

I know that the appeareance of the Fock operator is due to the minimization of the <E> with respect to each wavefunction, using Lagrange multipliers.

Since we do not make any assumption about the mathematical form of the orbitals we may be using, if my wavefunction had four parameters to optimize:

[tex]\Psi = c_1(\frac{\zeta_1^3}{\pi})^{1/2}e^{-\zeta_1r} + c_2(\frac{\zeta_2^3}{\pi})^{1/2}e^{-\zeta_2r}[/tex]

Would I get 4 Fock equations, one for each parameter?

Because in most of the derivations of the Fock equation it's written [tex]dL[{\Psi_i}] = 0[/tex] But when we are considering an infinitesimal change on our wavefunction it can be on any of its variables: [tex]\frac{\partial L[{\Psi_i}]}{\partial \Psi_i}\frac{\partial \Psi_i}{\partial r_i}\partial r_i[/tex]

Is this right?

Thank you

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Fock Operator for minimization

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Fock Operator minimization |
---|

A Vacuum in QFT: Fock space or effective potential? |

A What's the meaning of mean photon number? |

I How to pick an operator onto which the wavefunction collapses |

I The Ehrenfest Theorem |

A I'm getting the wrong inner product of Fock space |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**