Isham wrote:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9310/9310031v1.pdf

When we come to a Diff(M)-invariant theory like classical general relativity the role of time is very different. If M is equipped with a Lorentzian metric g, and if its topology is appropriate, it can be foliated in many ways as a one-parameter family of space-like

surfaces, and each such parameter might be regarded as a possible definition of time.

However several problems arise with this way of looking at things:

• There are many such foliations, and there is no way of selecting a particular one, or special family of such, that is ‘natural’ within the context of the theory alone.

• Such a definition of time is rather non-physical since it provides no hint as to how it might be measured or registered.

• The possibility of defining time in this way is closely linked to a fixed choice of the metric g. It becomes untenable if g is subject to some type of quantum fluctuation.

Why different slicings are so important problem of quantum gravity. As I understand, because of quantum fluctuations spacelike distances modifies to timelike ones and vice versa.

Are there any other problems?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Foliation of time in quantum gravity

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**