Force Acting on Charge on Metal Ball: Irodov Problem 3.69

  • Thread starter Thread starter -marko-
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irodov
-marko-
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A metal ball or radius R=1.5[cm] has a charge q=10e-6[C]. Find the modulus of the vector of the resultant force acting on a charge located on one half of the ball.

I found a solution on http://irodov.nm.ru/3/resh/3_69.gif but I don't understand explanations regardind to the problem so I would appreciate if anyone could explain a solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show your work before you get help.

Which part of the solution are you stuck in?
 
The whole problem is a little bit fuzzy to me (E', Eokp, E and relations between them), so it would be very helpful if you could explain main steps in solving this problem (without doing integration, just basic steps and formulae).

Thanks.
 
-marko- said:
A metal ball or radius R=1.5[cm] has a charge q=10e-6[C]. Find the modulus of the vector of the resultant force acting on a charge located on one half of the ball.
1. Find E using Gauss's law.
2. E_z=Ecos\theta=Qrcos\theta/R^3.
3. Integrate E_z\rho over the hemisphere.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top