Force as gradient of potential function

AI Thread Summary
Two points on an equipotential surface can indeed experience different force field strengths due to variations in the density of equipotential lines. For example, in the case of a dipole, the electric field is strongest at the midpoint between the charges. Similarly, a charged metal needle exhibits a higher electric field at its sharp point compared to its middle section. The discussion clarifies that while higher local density of field lines indicates a stronger electric field, it does not imply higher energy since the potential remains constant. Understanding these concepts helps clarify misconceptions about the relationship between surface area and field line density.
JP O'Donnell
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi.

Is it possible for two separate points on an equipotential surface to have two different values for the force field?

eg, point A and point B lie on an equipotential surface, but the equipotential surface spacing is much denser at A than at B - so the force field at A as the gradient of the potential must be greater than that at B?

Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you're right.

A good example is to think about a dipole, and the line (really a surface) that runs halfway between them:

Code:
        O
        |
<-------+------->
        |
        O

The electric field changes as one moves along the horizontal line, and has a maximum when you are halfway between the charges.
 
thanks.
 
Thanks allot...but can anyone gives more examples for me please..
 
Alia Al-Hajri said:
Thanks allot...but can anyone gives more examples for me please..
What about a charged metal needle? At the sharp point E is a lot higher then in the middle. In general any surface having the smaller radius has the higher density of field lines. Mind you higher local density doesn't equate to higher energy, this is so because the potential is equal.
 
Per Oni said:
What about a charged metal needle? At the sharp point E is a lot higher then in the middle. In general any surface having the smaller radius has the higher density of field lines. Mind you higher local density doesn't equate to higher energy, this is so because the potential is equal.

Oh' ...Thank you..I really get the idea

I used to think that the surface area anything is a direct match with the density of field lines

So, That is not true!
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top