Force as gradient of potential function

AI Thread Summary
Two points on an equipotential surface can indeed experience different force field strengths due to variations in the density of equipotential lines. For example, in the case of a dipole, the electric field is strongest at the midpoint between the charges. Similarly, a charged metal needle exhibits a higher electric field at its sharp point compared to its middle section. The discussion clarifies that while higher local density of field lines indicates a stronger electric field, it does not imply higher energy since the potential remains constant. Understanding these concepts helps clarify misconceptions about the relationship between surface area and field line density.
JP O'Donnell
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi.

Is it possible for two separate points on an equipotential surface to have two different values for the force field?

eg, point A and point B lie on an equipotential surface, but the equipotential surface spacing is much denser at A than at B - so the force field at A as the gradient of the potential must be greater than that at B?

Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you're right.

A good example is to think about a dipole, and the line (really a surface) that runs halfway between them:

Code:
        O
        |
<-------+------->
        |
        O

The electric field changes as one moves along the horizontal line, and has a maximum when you are halfway between the charges.
 
thanks.
 
Thanks allot...but can anyone gives more examples for me please..
 
Alia Al-Hajri said:
Thanks allot...but can anyone gives more examples for me please..
What about a charged metal needle? At the sharp point E is a lot higher then in the middle. In general any surface having the smaller radius has the higher density of field lines. Mind you higher local density doesn't equate to higher energy, this is so because the potential is equal.
 
Per Oni said:
What about a charged metal needle? At the sharp point E is a lot higher then in the middle. In general any surface having the smaller radius has the higher density of field lines. Mind you higher local density doesn't equate to higher energy, this is so because the potential is equal.

Oh' ...Thank you..I really get the idea

I used to think that the surface area anything is a direct match with the density of field lines

So, That is not true!
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top