Force Between A and D: Repulsive?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hotmail590
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the force between two balls, A and D, where ball A carries an unknown charge and ball D is an uncharged copper ball. A positive test charge experiences attraction to both balls, prompting questions about the interactions and charge distributions involved.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the charge on ball A and the uncharged state of ball D, questioning whether the attraction of the test charge indicates similar charges on A and D. Some participants consider the role of copper as a conductor and its effect on charge distribution.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights about charge induction and the nature of forces between charged and uncharged objects. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the charges on A and D, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions of charge, the implications of charge induction, and the characteristics of conductors like copper. The problem's constraints include the ambiguity of the charge on ball A and the implications of ball D being uncharged.

hotmail590
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
There is a ball (A) is carrying a uniformly distributed unknown charge(which may be zero) and an uncharged copper ball (D). A positive test charge (T) experiences highly attraction with ball (A) and (D). What is the nature of the force between balls A and D if they are brought very close together?


Choices are

attractive
repulsive
no force



What I think the answer should be is repulsive because since (T) is strongly attacted to both balls, that means both balls must have a same charge; therefore repel when brought close together.

However it says in the problem that the copper ball (D) is uncharged. What does that mean? It has equal amount of electrons and protons?

Also what does copper come to play here? I know it is an extremely good conductor of electricity but does this fact play an important role in this question?


Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know what sign the charge is on A. Since D is uncharged but nevertheless attracted to the test charge you must infer that the test charge induces charge on D. It is reasonable to conclude that were the test charge negative you would get the same result.

What would you then conclude about A interacting with D?
 
Then I would believe that both A and D are negatively charged and when placed near each other they will repel?
 
D is not charged!
 
A positive test charge (T) experiences highly attraction with ball (A) and (D).
Meaning D is negative?!??
 
What you are missing here is that the TOTAL charge of a ball can be zero, but that negative charges move to the left of the ball, and positive charges move to the right of the ball. This can be caused (induced!) by a nearby charge, who will attract opposite charges near it, and (hence) have opposing charges far away from it. Because the force goes in 1/r^2, the near charges are "felt" stronger than the far away charges, which induces a net force between the ball and the inducing charge. In this case, it will be an attractive force.
 
hotmail590 said:
There is a ball (A) is carrying a uniformly distributed unknown charge
I thought this meant all the balls? But now I realize it doesn't have to.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K