Force between polar molecule and an ion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force components acting on an ion due to a polar molecule, specifically HCl, using the potential energy equation U = -b/x^2. The y-component of the force, Fy, is established as zero, while the x-component, Fx, is debated, with participants considering the relationship between force and potential energy. The correct approach involves applying the derivative of the potential energy to find the force, leading to the conclusion that Fx should be -2b/x^3, as the force must be directed towards the polar molecule. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the signs in the equations and the physical implications of the forces involved.
Westin
Messages
87
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Under certain conditions the interaction between a "polar" molecule such as HCl located at the origin and an ion located along the x-axis can be described by a potential energy U=−b[PLAIN]https://s3.lite.msu.edu/adm/jsMath/fonts/cmmi10/alpha/144/char3D.pngx^2, where b is a constant.

What is Fx, the x component of the force on the ion?

Fx=
stift.gif
What is Fy, the y component of the force on the ion?

Fy= 0[/B]

Homework Equations



U=-b/x^2[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



The y component of the force on the ion was fairly obvious but I am getting stuck on the x component.

I know that the force must me positive but it was incorrect when I tried +b[PLAIN]https://s3.lite.msu.edu/adm/jsMath/fonts/cmmi10/alpha/144/char3D.pngx^3[/B][/B]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to know the partial charges and their separation/distance.
 
these are the choices i have
A). +2b/x^3
B). 0
C). +b/x^3
D). -2b/x^3
E). -b/(2x)
F). -b/x^3
G). -b/x
 
What is the relation between force and potential?
 
Westin said:
I know that the force must me positive
Why?
 
TESL@ said:
I think you need to know the partial charges and their separation/distance.
Why do you say that?
 
The molecule will rotate in such way that H will be at the farthest and Cl at the closest point to the ion. Then the force will depend on partial charges and the distance between both H and Cl, and ion and molecule.
 
TESL@ said:
The molecule will rotate in such way that H will be at the farthest and Cl at the closest point to the ion. Then the force will depend on partial charges and the distance between both H and Cl, and ion and molecule.
On can infer from the equation U=−b/x2 that the molecule is taken as a point dipole with its orientation assumed to be always favorable.
 
Wait, wouldn't the answer be negative because the force on an object is the negative of the derivative of the potential function? The potential energy U is equal to the work you must do against that force to move an object from the U=0 reference point to the position r. The force you must exert to move it must be equal but oppositely directed, and that is the source of the negative sign.
 
  • #10
I'm almost positive the answer is -b/(2x) after what I just said. Any feedback?
 
  • #11
Westin said:
I'm almost positive the answer is -b/(2x) after what I just said. Any feedback?
Again, what is the equation that relates force and potential energy?
 
  • #12
DrClaude said:
Again, what is the equation that relates force and potential energy?
F = -dU/dx
 
  • #13
Westin said:
F = -dU/dx
Great, now apply that equation to the problem given.
 
  • #14
Im confused with on how to.. F = −b/x^2 take derive then get -b/2x
 
  • #15
Westin said:
Im confused with on how to.. F = −b/x^2 take derive then get -b/2x
I guess you mean U. What is the derivative of ##x^{-2}##?
 
  • #16
DrClaude said:
Great, now apply that equation to the problem given.
F = -b/x^2 ---> -bx^-2 ---> 2b/x^3 this is it
 
  • #17
Westin said:
F = -b/x^2 ---> -bx^-2 ---> 2b/x^3 this is it
It was incorrect... I have one try left , I don't get what else it could be
 
  • #18
Westin said:
F = -b/x^2 ---> -bx^-2 ---> 2b/x^3 this is it
Doesn't this contradict what you wrote earlier?
Westin said:
Wait, wouldn't the answer be negative because the force on an object is the negative of the derivative of the potential function? The potential energy U is equal to the work you must do against that force to move an object from the U=0 reference point to the position r. The force you must exert to move it must be equal but oppositely directed, and that is the source of the negative sign.

Westin said:
It was incorrect... I have one try left , I don't get what else it could be
Before submitting answers, let's check if they make sense...
 
  • #19
Ahh yes it does,-2b/x^3 should be correct? I am sorry for my personal confusion. I'm in a poor experimental physics class at Michigan state where you have to teach yourself online everything..
 
  • #20
It's ok to be confused. I'm just hoping that you can gain some good habits. From the formula for energy, you can see that the energy increases (decreases in magnitude but with a negative sign) when the ion moves away from the origin, so the force must be directed towards the molecule. That takes care of the sign. Then it is just a question of going back to fundamentals, ie, F = -dU/dx, to get the force. Then you can check that the answer makes sense, considering the physics (force must be directed towards the origin). It's easy to lose track of minus signs, especially in a case like this where you get 3 in a row.
 
Back
Top