Force Direction: Understanding Upward Motion on Lowering Objects

AI Thread Summary
When lowering an object, an upward force is applied to counteract gravity, which allows the object to descend more slowly than it would under gravity alone. This scenario illustrates that the direction of force can differ from the direction of motion, as seen in other examples like braking in a car, where motion continues forward while the force acts backward. The net force acting on an object determines its acceleration, not its velocity, meaning multiple forces can act in different directions simultaneously. Understanding that the net force dictates acceleration clarifies why objects can move contrary to the direction of applied forces. Overall, the relationship between force, motion, and acceleration is complex and often counterintuitive.
Balsam
Messages
226
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


My teacher said that if you are holding an object in your hands and lowering it downwards, you are applying force in the upwards direction. How does this make sense and are there any other cases where the direction of an objects force is opposite the direction of its motion?

Homework Equations


--

The Attempt at a Solution


Does this only happen when an object is slowing down in one direction- slowing down in one direction, the force applied on the object is in the opposite direction?[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The net force gives the acceleration, not the velocity.
An example is if you are in a car and applying the breaks... your motion is forward but the force is backwards.
If the car goes forward around a circle at constant speed, then the force points towards the center of the circle.

In your example, though, your hands are not the only force on the object, there is also gravity.
Your hands are making the object fall more slowly that it would under gravity alone, so you are reducing the total downward force the object experiences... so you must be providing an upwards force.

It is possible to have many forces on an object that do not point in the same direction as the resulting acceleration... this is unremarkable because it is the net force that determines the acceleration. The object may be picking up speed in the direction opposite the force... that just means there is another, even stronger, force present.
 
Simon Bridge said:
The net force gives the acceleration, not the velocity.
An example is if you are in a car and applying the breaks... your motion is forward but the force is backwards.
If the car goes forward around a circle at constant speed, then the force points towards the center of the circle.

In your example, though, your hands are not the only force on the object, there is also gravity.
Your hands are making the object fall more slowly that it would under gravity alone, so you are reducing the total downward force the object experiences... so you must be providing an upwards force.

It is possible to have many forces on an object that do not point in the same direction as the resulting acceleration... this is unremarkable because it is the net force that determines the acceleration. The object may be picking up speed in the direction opposite the force... that just means there is another, even stronger, force present.
Thank you
 
  • Like
Likes Simon Bridge
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top