Force extension graph displacememt to Kenetic energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the efficiency and predicted height of an arrow fired from a self-built acrylic bow. The user recorded various forces and the corresponding heights achieved by the arrow, attempting to convert the area under a force-extension graph into kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy (GPE). They reported an efficiency of 262% at 2N and 0.8% at 9N but expressed uncertainty about their height calculations. Another participant suggested using the work done by pulling the bow to determine potential energy directly, simplifying the height calculation to a formula involving force, distance, mass, and gravity. The user acknowledged this alternative approach and expressed gratitude for the insight.
Roberto2391
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to work out the efficiency for a self built acrylic bow, but I am having some problems working out a predicted height my arrow will reach. For the experiment i fired the arrow into the air and recorded the height it travelled, I have also recorded the weight of the arrow and the force applied to the sting when firing the arrow.

I then proceeded to do this for ten set forces 1N- 10N recording the results, after recording the results i worked out a way in which I could convert the area under a force extension graph into kinetic energy and then into GPE. Once I had the GPE I would divide the total by gravity and then by the mass of the arrow, giving me a predicted height.


To work out the height the arrow would travel, I measured the distance the arrow traveled for each of my forces; I then drew a force extension graph, using my method I worked out that 2N my bow was 262% efficient and for 9N my bow was 0.8% efficient.

A table of my results has been uploaded

I worked out the predicted height by using this chain of thought

Displacement under the graph = Kinetic Energy
Kinetic Energy = Gravitational potential energy
Gravitational potential energy / Mass and gravity

I don’t think I am working out the predicted height correctly but I can't think of another way to do it, all help welcome.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Please, please upload a PDF version of your doc. Many people here would not open a DOC file for fear of virus.
 
Defennder said:
Please, please upload a PDF version of your doc. Many people here would not open a DOC file for fear of virus.

I'm on my work comp so I'm not afraid. :cool:

Theres obviously something seriously wrong with your calculations. Since you haven't shown any of your calculations I don't know what that is. What function are you integrating to determine your kinetic energy? And BTW, you don't have to calculate the kinetic energy, if you know the work done by pulling the bow, then you can easily determine its ideal potential energy at its max height.

Work = Force of pull x distance of pull = Potential energy

In other words, your ideal (no losses) height will be:

height = \frac{Fd}{mg}
 
Defennder said:
Please, please upload a PDF version of your doc. Many people here would not open a DOC file for fear of virus.

I will remember that for the future.

Topher925 said:
Work = Force of pull x distance of pull = Potential energy

In other words, your ideal (no losses) height will be:

height = \frac{Fd}{mg}

And i had not though of working it out like that thank you very much
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top