Force felt by plates in a waveguide

Hogarth4
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A TE_10 mode is propagating in a rectangular waveguide along the z-axis. If the waveguide is terminated with a perfectly conducting metal plate normal to the z-axis, then 100% of the electromagnetic radiation propagating in the guide will be reflected by the metal plate. If the dimensions of the guide are a by b with the cutoff frequency ω_c = cπ/a,

1) what is the force felt by the metal plate due to the reflected radiation?
2) if instead of a metal plate, a resistive plate which absorbed 100% of the incident radiation were used, what would be the force experienced by this resistive plate?

Homework Equations



F = q(E + v x B) ??



The Attempt at a Solution



For TE_10, B_z = B_o*cos(πx/a)??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) The force felt by the metal plate would be equal to the force exerted by the electric and magnetic fields of the incident radiation. Using the equation F = q(E + v x B), where q is the charge of the particle, E is the electric field, v is the velocity of the particle and B is the magnetic field, the force felt by the metal plate can be calculated. 2) If the waveguide is terminated with a resistive plate, then the force experienced by this plate will depend on how much of the incident radiation is absorbed by the plate. For example, if 100% of the incident radiation is absorbed, then the force experienced by the plate will be equal to the force experienced by the metal plate in the first case.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top