Force of a car crash basic physics.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of a car crash, specifically applying Newton's law of motion, F=ma. When a car hits a wall at a constant speed, the force exerted during the crash is significant due to the rapid negative acceleration as the car comes to a stop. This negative acceleration results in a large force being applied to the wall, not a backward force as initially questioned. The confusion arises from differentiating between the force acting on the car and the force exerted by the car on the wall, which is equal and opposite according to Newton's third law. Understanding these concepts clarifies how force is generated in a collision scenario.
InsideJoke
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello all.
Firstly, I want to note that I'm sure you've all heard this question multiple times but I don't know what search phrases I would use to find it - so I'm sorry for asking a boring basic question.

OK,
I'm learning extremely basic introductory physics and I was having a look at Newton's law f=ma
for an assignment on car safety.

I was just wondering what would happen if a car hit, say, a wall while at a constant speed and not accelerating? I mean, that would mean the force would be zero but it seems to me that in a car crash the car exerts huge amounts of force forward into whatever it's hitting.

I've heard that the accelerating in this type of question is actually the negative acceleration of the car as it comes to a sudden stop but what puzzles me is wouldn't that meant the force would be transferred backward, not forward into the wall? If the force was created by negative acceleration wouldn't that mean it would have to be a negative force (very basic physics knowledge here, so if it does in fact mean negative force please explain)? (f= say, 500kg * -90km/ph^2 = -45000)
Sorry for certain errors in maths and units ect but I'm sure you get my gist.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can look at it in a different light:

Force is also defined as the change in momentum (mass * velocity) of the object with respect to time. That is

F = mv/t

When the car crashes to a wall then the time it takes for the velocity to change is very small. So F = mv/ 0.0001 seconds is a large force.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hello InsideJoke! Welcome to PF! :smile:
InsideJoke said:
I've heard that the accelerating in this type of question is actually the negative acceleration of the car as it comes to a sudden stop but what puzzles me is wouldn't that meant the force would be transferred backward, not forward into the wall? If the force was created by negative acceleration wouldn't that mean it would have to be a negative force (very basic physics knowledge here, so if it does in fact mean negative force please explain)?

You're confusing the force on the car with the force from the car.

In F = ma, F is the total force on the body whose acceleration is a.

The car's acceleration is negative, so the force on it is negative.

The force from the car on the wall is equal and oppostie (good ol' Netwon's third law :wink:), ie positive.
 
oh!
that makes sense!
thanks very much for that :D
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top