Calculating Bridge Pillar Forces: Solving a Seesaw Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter jjjsarnis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the forces exerted by two pillars supporting a uniform bridge under static equilibrium conditions. The bridge, weighing 400,000 N, is 20 m long with pillars located 3 m from each end, while a 19,600 N car is parked 8 m from one end. Participants emphasize the importance of ensuring the net force and net torque are both zero for the system to remain in equilibrium. They suggest using equations that relate the weights and distances of the forces acting on the bridge to derive simultaneous equations for the reaction forces at the pillars. The conversation concludes with a confirmation that net torque is indeed a factor in static equilibrium.
jjjsarnis
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
the problem reads:

a uniform bridge 20 m long and weighing 400,000 N is supported by two pillars located 3 m from each end. if a 19,600 N car is parked 8 m from one end of the bridge, hoe much force does each pilliar exert?

i was thinking about using something like (W1)(d1) = (W2)(d2) that we used early for a seesaw problem. also if the sum of forces could be added up to equal zero and place it in equilibrium.

thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you're sort of on the right track. First of all, the net force would be zero. This is because the system is in static equilibrium. I'm not sure which seesaw problem you're referring to but (W1)(d1) = (W2)(d2) would not help. If a system is in static equilibrium, there are two things that must be true. First of all, the net force is zero. What is the other one?
 
Consider the forces acting on the bridge. You should have the weight of the car and two normal reaction forces (one each from each of the pillars). Make a simple equatio relating those three forces. Now consider moments about one of the pillars (it doesn't matter which, just pick one). Make another equation for the balance of the moments. Now you have two simple simultaneous equations in two variables (the two reaction forces). Solve for them and you have your answer.
 
thanks guys, the other thing in static equilibrium would be net torque would equal zero but i didnt think there was any torque in this sytem, thanks again for your help
 
Great job!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top