Force on a point charge at the tip of a solid uniformly charged insulating cone

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric force on a point charge at the tip of a solid uniformly charged insulating cone. The cone has a uniform charge density and a total charge, with the electric field derived from the axis of a disk. Participants clarify the correct formula for the electric field and suggest treating the cone as a stack of disks to find the charge element. Corrections are made regarding the integration process and the representation of equations in LaTeX. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations and proper notation in physics problems.
tripleM
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid insulating cone has a uniform charge density of rho and a total charge of Q. The base of teh cone had a radius of R and a height of h. We wish to find the electric force on a point charge of q' at point A, located at the tip of the cone. (Hint: You may use the result of the electric force along the axis of a disk when solving this problem.)


Homework Equations


[
E= \frac{Q}{2\pi \epsilon_{0} R^{2} }(1 -\frac{z}{ (z^{2}+R^{2}) ^{1/2} })


The Attempt at a Solution


I decide to lay the cone flat along the z axis. My calculations are independent of the coordinate system though ( which I think may be wrong). I choose a flat disc(area of a circle) for my charge element dQ.
\rho = \frac{Q}{V}
dq = \rho \pi r^{2}
dF = \frac{\rho \pi r^{2}dr}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}h^{2}}
F = \frac{\rho \pi}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}h^{2}}\int^{0}_{R}r^{2}dr
F = \frac{-\rho\pi R^{3}}{12\pi \epsilon_{0}H^{2}}
F = \frac{-Q R^{3}}{12\pi \epsilon_{0}H^{4}}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
first, the formula you have given for the electric field on the axis of the disk seems to be wrong. It should be

E= \frac{Q}{2\pi\epsilon_o R^2} \left[1 - \frac{z}{(z^2+R^2)^{1/2}}\right ]

where z is the distance of point A on the axis of the disk. Now you can think of a cone as
pile of disks. So when you consider the charge element dQ, it should be
dQ=\rho\pi R^2 t where t is the thickness of the disk. You can take t as
another small element dx where x is the distance of the disk from the base.

Edit: For writing quotients in latex use \frac and not \stackrel. The later is used for
writing some content above another. look here
http://www.ee.iitb.ac.in/~trivedi/LatexHelp/latex/stackrel.html
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top