Force on a sphere in a constant external electric field

AI Thread Summary
An uncharged solid sphere placed in a constant external electric field E0 experiences induced charge separation, resulting in the formation of a dipole. The force on the sphere can be calculated using the induced charge and the electric field near the sphere. The equation F = q*E is applicable, where q represents the induced charge and E is the electric field acting on the sphere. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing that while the external field is uniform, the induced dipole creates a net force on the sphere. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
captain.joco
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An uncharged solid sphere is paced in a constant external electric field E0. What is the force on the sphere?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know ( already have found ) the electric potential and electric field around the sphere. Also worked out the surface charged density. I don't know how to calculate the force..Any help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't F = q*E ?
 
It seemed too simple somehow... Is q the induced charge on the sphere, and E the electric field close to the sphere??

Thank you for your help
 
captain.joco said:
It seemed too simple somehow... Is q the induced charge on the sphere, and E the electric field close to the sphere??

Thank you for your help

If there is charge separation, what will the net force be?
 
Got it! Thanks a lot for the help!
 
This is the exact question i was looking for help with and still not sure of what the next step is.

I know the uniform E-field causes the sphere to gain an induced dipole. From this how do you get the force? Is it ok to just assume the E-field remains uniform.. this can't be right as there would then be no force and seems there must be a force from the way the question is worded.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Induced charge on a conducting sphere sliced by a plane
Replies
2
Views
1K
Work done to insert a point charge 𝑞 at the center of a conducting sphere
Replies
12
Views
1K
Magnetization of a paramagnetic sphere
Replies
11
Views
1K
Flux of Electric field through sphere
Replies
2
Views
2K
Electric field external to Conducting Hollow Sphere with charge inside
Replies
23
Views
3K
Why are the electrostatic field lines normal to a charged conductor?
Replies
10
Views
1K
Induced polarization for collision between conducting spheres
Replies
4
Views
1K
Electric Field Inside a Conducting Sphere: Is it Always Zero?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Should I Consider the Electric Field Outside a Uniformly Charged Sphere?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Charge on a grounded conducting sphere in a uniform electric field, after ungrounding and movement
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top