Force on Particle Attached to Springs: Explained

AI Thread Summary
A particle of mass m attached to two identical springs on a frictionless table experiences a force described by F = -2kx(1 - (L/(x^2 + L^2)^(0.5)))i when pulled perpendicular to the springs' equilibrium position. The discussion clarifies the interpretation of the setup, assuming the springs are anchored 2L apart with the particle positioned between them. It explains the geometry involved, where the hypotenuse of the right triangle formed by the springs and the particle leads to the stretch of each spring being √(L² + x²) - L. The forces from each spring are analyzed, revealing that the x-components cancel while the perpendicular components add, resulting in the total force on the particle. The relationship x = (x² + L²)^(0.5) - L is derived from trigonometric principles to aid in solving the problem.
FOBoi1122
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A particle of mass m is attatched to 2 identical springs on a horizontal frictionless table. both springs have spring constant k and an unstretched length L the particle is pulled a distance x along a direction perpindicular to the initial configuration of the springs, show that the force exerted on the particle due to the springs is

F= -2kx(1-(L/(x^2+L^2)^.5))i


please help us, we've tried to use f=-kxcos(theta), where cos(theta) = x/(x^2+L^2) but we are unable to determine why x = (x^2+L^2)^.5 - L which is needed to solve the problem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem itself is not clear. I could interpret this as two springs in series with the "particle" attached at the end or with the two springs both attached to a wall and the particle between them.

Since in the first case it would be simpler to treat the two springs as a single spring, I suspect the second is intended.

It also is not stated clearly, but I will assume it, that the two springs are attached at points 2L apart so that the springs start in equilibrium position with the particle between them.

Now, as the particle is moved perpendicular to the wall, a distance x, we see two congruent right triangles. One leg is of Length L (from point of attachment to center) and the other is of length x so the hypotenuse has length √(L2+ x2). The hypotenuse is, of course, the full stretched length of one spring so the amount of stretch is √(L2+ x2)-L.

The total force due to one spring is k√(L2+ x2)-L but this is directed toward the point of attachment. If we break that into components, parallel and perpendicular to the wall, we see that the parallel forces of the two springs cancel each other while the ones perpendicular to the wall add.

You are correct that the pependicular force for each spring is F (x/√(L2+ x2)so the total force is twice that: (2k√(L2+ x2)-L)(x/√(L2+ x2).

The answer you give is that, with -i since it is directed back toward the wall.
 


The force exerted on the particle due to the springs can be determined by considering the equilibrium of forces acting on the particle. Since the table is frictionless, the only forces acting on the particle are the forces exerted by the springs.

First, let's consider the forces exerted by each spring individually. Since the springs are identical, they will exert equal and opposite forces on the particle. Let's call these forces F1 and F2, with F1 acting in the positive x-direction and F2 acting in the negative x-direction.

Now, let's break down each of these forces into their x and y-components. The x-component of F1 can be calculated using the trigonometric relationship cos(theta) = x/(x^2+L^2), where theta is the angle between the x-axis and the line connecting the particle to the equilibrium point of the spring. Similarly, the x-component of F2 can be calculated as -cos(theta).

Next, we can use Hooke's Law to express the magnitude of each force in terms of the displacement x. Since each spring has a spring constant k and an unstretched length L, the magnitude of F1 and F2 can be written as kx and -kx, respectively.

Now, to find the total force exerted on the particle, we simply need to add the x-components of F1 and F2, which gives us:

F = kx(-cos(theta) + cos(theta))

= -2kx(cos(theta))

= -2kx(x/(x^2+L^2))

= -2kx(1-(L/(x^2+L^2)^.5))

Therefore, the force exerted on the particle due to the springs is F= -2kx(1-(L/(x^2+L^2)^.5))i, where i is the unit vector in the x-direction. This is the same result that was given in the problem statement.

I hope this explanation helps you understand why x = (x^2+L^2)^.5 - L is needed to solve the problem. It comes from the trigonometric relationship cos(theta) = x/(x^2+L^2), which is used to calculate the x-component of the force exerted by each spring.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top