Force over a frictionless Surface

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a person pushing a crate over a frictionless surface with a constant force. Participants explore the implications of this scenario, including the dynamics of motion, the role of external forces, and various hypothetical setups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if the crate accelerates, the person would need to run to keep applying force, raising questions about the feasibility of this scenario.
  • Another participant humorously notes that the person might fall on the frictionless surface, proposing alternative methods like pushing from a chopper or letting the crate move at constant speed.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of focusing on relevant aspects of the problem, suggesting that the complexities of the scenario may not be essential for understanding the core physics involved.
  • One contributor proposes using a long stick to push the crate and mentions conservation of momentum, indicating that the center of mass would remain fixed.
  • Another participant points out that the original question does not specify that the person is standing on the frictionless surface, suggesting alternative scenarios like pushing on a roller track.
  • A participant highlights that if the person is on the frictionless surface, it complicates the physics problem significantly.
  • One suggestion involves using a string and pulley system to maintain a constant force, cautioning against common misconceptions about attaching mass to the string.
  • Another idea is to tilt the frictionless surface, allowing the crate to experience a constant force down the slope without direct contact from the person.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the scenario, with no consensus reached. Various methods and interpretations are proposed, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the setup, such as the position of the person relative to the crate and the nature of the surface, remain unresolved. The discussion includes multiple hypothetical scenarios that complicate the analysis.

nDever
Messages
76
Reaction score
1
Hey,

A certain problem in my physics textbook states that a person pushes a crate over a frictionless surface with a constant force.

If the crate accelerates, wouldn't the person eventually have to start running with it in order to keep applying force to it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. But he wouldn't be able to, because he'd fall on the ice first.:wink: Perhaps he could push it with constant force from a chopper. Or just let go of the crate and let it move at some constant speed (neglecting resisting forces like air).
 
Deleting a trivial response
 
Last edited:
nDever said:
Hey,

A certain problem in my physics textbook states that a person pushes a crate over a frictionless surface with a constant force.

If the crate accelerates, wouldn't the person eventually have to start running with it in order to keep applying force to it?

Physics is difficult enough as it is without worrying about things that really do not matter in trying to understand and tackle this problem. I suggest you concentrate on what really matters.

Zz.
 
I like your query and will re-post my original response... he could push with a long stick. I have tried to think of other ways and I am still thinking about it (have lots of time)
To raise the level I would add that conservation of momentum could be used to analyse the resulting motion and I believe that the centre of mass of the system would remain fixed.
However, I do not know what really matters in physics.
 
Last edited:
@#2, #5: The OP's question doesn't say the person is also standing on the frictionless surface. Think about pushing a crate along a roller track, for example.

Also, what ZZ said.
 
If he is standing on the frictionless surface this becomes a very interesting physics problem !
 
You could attach a string to the far end of the crate, pass it over a frictionless, massless pulley, pull the string back with an attached spring ensuring that the spring extension is constant.
It is a common mistake to assume that you could attach a mass to the string and expect its weight to provide a constant force. Don't get caught by that nDever !
 
you could tilt the frictionless surface to 30 degrees then the object would experience a constant force of 0.5W (W = weight of crate) down the slope WITHOUT the person touching the crate...ZZZZZZZ
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K