Force Relative to the vertical?

AI Thread Summary
Cosine theta is vertical and sine theta is horizontal because of the angle's definition in relation to the force vector. In the example provided, theta is measured between the force vector and the vertical axis, which determines the orientation of the sine and cosine functions. If theta were defined between the force vector and the horizontal axis, the roles of sine and cosine would indeed switch. This distinction is crucial for understanding vector components in physics. Clarifying the angle's reference point helps resolve confusion about trigonometric relationships.
Scorry
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
Can you explain why cosine theta is vertical, and sin theta is horizontal on this example? I am confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Scorry said:
Can you explain why cosine theta is vertical, and sin theta is horizontal on this example? I am confused.

Link?

Does it look like this?

https://www.cdli.ca/sampleResources/physics3204/unit01_org02_ilo03/u01-s02-ls03-lessonfig07.gif
u01-s02-ls03-lessonfig07.gif
 
Thanks. I attached a photo, but it's not showing up. Your example is what we're covering next, I haven't gotten there yet.
image.jpeg
image.jpeg
 
It's because of which angle theta they are using (they show theta between the force vector and the vertical axis). If they defined/chose theta to be between the force vector and the horizontal axis, that would switch the sin() and cos() terms, right?
 
berkeman said:
It's because of which angle theta they are using (they show theta between the force vector and the vertical axis). If they defined/chose theta to be between the force vector and the horizontal axis, that would switch the sin() and cos() terms, right?
Thanks man, it makes a little more sense. I haven't taken trig in a few years.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Lagrangian for pendulum
Replies
11
Views
2K
B Sign conventions in torque and non-uniform circular motion
Replies
1
Views
1K
B Normal force in case of inclined plane and banked turn
Replies
3
Views
2K
B Sign problems with vectors, how can we "resolve" this....
Replies
36
Views
3K
I Bead on a vertical frictionless ring
Replies
20
Views
2K
I How to quantify gyroscopic precession torque?
Replies
34
Views
3K
B Torsion Involving an Off Axis Thrust
2
Replies
66
Views
5K
I Momentum of a Water Jet Impacting Plate
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Is Mechanical Energy Conservation Free of Ambiguity - follow up
2
Replies
77
Views
4K
I Conservation of KE, wedge striking ball
Replies
8
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top