Force Required to Tip a Block of wood?

  • Thread starter Thread starter melancholy2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Force Wood
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum force required to tip a wooden block placed on a smooth, frictionless surface. The block pivots counter-clockwise when a force is applied at its bottom left edge, raising questions about the appropriate pivot point and the effects of acceleration. Participants suggest using the lower left edge as the pivot, noting that applying force F generates torque, while also considering the impact of a pseudoforce in a non-inertial frame. The challenge lies in balancing these forces to determine the tipping condition. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of analyzing motion and forces in this scenario.
melancholy2
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Please refer to the attached diagram.

I was playing around with pulling tablecloths out from the bottom of plates and objects resting on it, and was getting good results. I also happened to have a cuboid wooden paperweight which was on the table cloth and I noticed that that wooden block would tip and stand up if I didn't pull hard enough (but enough to make it tip).

This got me thinking how I would calculate the force required to be exerted on the block in order to achieve this effect. I haven't been able to figure out anything yet, so I would like some inputs. I reformed the effect in the form of a question:

A block of wood with mass M, height h and length l is placed on a smooth frictionless surface. A force F is applied at the bottom left edge of the wooden block, causing it to pivot at that edge, counter-clockwise upwards till it is standing up. Find the minimum force required.

If one were to consider moments, where would one use as a pivot? If it were at the bottom edge, then F wouldn't generate a torque, and it wouldn't tip. Anywhere else on the cube and the pivot will also rise (will that cause any problems?).
 

Attachments

  • forcerequired.JPG
    forcerequired.JPG
    2.7 KB · Views: 532
Physics news on Phys.org
Realize that as soon as you apply the force F, the block will accelerate. The easiest way to analyze the motion is from the view of the non-inertial frame co-moving with the block. In that frame you need to add a pseudoforce that acts at the block's center of mass. In effect you'll have two forces exerting a torque about the lower left hand corner (a fine pivot point)--figure out when one is great enough to overcome the other.
 
Doc Al said:
Realize that as soon as you apply the force F, the block will accelerate. The easiest way to analyze the motion is from the view of the non-inertial frame co-moving with the block. In that frame you need to add a pseudoforce that acts at the block's center of mass. In effect you'll have two forces exerting a torque about the lower left hand corner (a fine pivot point)--figure out when one is great enough to overcome the other.

Thanks for the help but I still can't figure out how much that imaginary force would be. Will taking the view of the non-inertial frame comoving with the block, would that also affect how I find force F (which I have to minus the accelerating force?). I have no clue where to place the pivot given that it will rise when the block starts tipping.
 
Viewed from a non-inertial frame that accelerates to the right, there will be an imaginary force to the left equal to ma. Since F is the accelerating force, the imaginary force will equal F. As I said before, use the lower left edge as your pivot.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Does Poisson's equation hold due to vector potential cancellation?'
Imagine that two charged particles, with charge ##+q##, start at the origin and then move apart symmetrically on the ##+y## and ##-y## axes due to their electrostatic repulsion. The ##y##-component of the retarded Liénard-Wiechert vector potential at a point along the ##x##-axis due to the two charges is $$ \begin{eqnarray*} A_y&=&\frac{q\,[\dot{y}]_{\mathrm{ret}}}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 c^2[(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}+y\dot{y}/c]_{\mathrm{ret}}}\tag{1}\\...
Back
Top