Forced Oscillations: +ve Sign of Fcoswt

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation of forced oscillations, specifically addressing why the term Fcos(ωt) is positive. The sign is arbitrary; changing it to negative would merely alter the phase of the oscillation without affecting the fundamental behavior. The second term represents a time-dependent external force, which can take any sign and shape, with harmonic forces being particularly notable for their Fourier series representation. The Green's function approach is highlighted as a method to solve for any external force, ensuring causality by only considering past influences on the system. Ultimately, the analysis emphasizes the importance of maintaining a consistent coordinate system for clarity in dynamics.
dennisrobert
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In the equation of forced oscillations (given below),

ma = -kx + FCoswt, why is that the 2nd term on the right hand side is given the +ve sign. I know that kx should be negative since 'ma' and 'x' are in opposite directions. I can't quite seem to get the gist of Fcoswt being given a +ve sign. Can someone clarify?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's arbitrary. Replacing the + with a - would work just as well. It would only change the phase of the forced oscillations. It would effectively change the direction in which the mass is being displaced instantly after t = 0. If the sign is +, then the mass gets displaced (originally, directly after t = 0) along the positive x-axis, and if the sign is - then the original displacement is along negative x-axis.
 
The second term is simply the time dependent external force. It can have any sign and also any functional shape as you like. The harmonic shape is particularly interesting since you can describe any external force by a Fourier series (periodic force) or a Fourier integral (non-periodic force).

The general solution for any external force is given with help of the retarded Green's function of the corresponding differential operator of the homogeneous equation, i.e., which obeys the equation of motion with a \delta force,

(\partial_t^2+\omega_0^2) G(t,t')=\delta(t-t'). \qquad (1)

If you can find the Green's function, for any external force, a solution reads

x(t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{d} t' G(t,t') \frac{F(t')}{m}.

To find the Green's function, you make the ansatz

G(t,t&#039;)=\begin{cases} 0 &amp; \text{for} \quad t&lt;t&#039;, \\<br /> g(t,t&#039;) &amp; \text{for} \quad t&gt;t&#039;.<br /> \end{cases}

The imposed condition for the Green's function to vanish for t&lt;t&#039; ensures that the external force only acts from the past and not the future on the position of the particle as it must be according to causality. That's what distinguishes the retarded propagator from any other solution of the Green's-function equation.

To solve it, you can simply use the fact that for t\neq t&#039; the \delta distribution vanishes, and then the solution reads

g(t,t&#039;)=A \exp(\mathrm{i} \omega_0 t)+B \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega_0 t). \qquad (2)

Now we need two initial conditions to determine the integration constants, A and B. The first is given by the continuity of G(t,t&#039;) at t=t&#039;, i.e., we must have

g(t&#039;+0^+,t&#039;)=0. \qquad (3)

The second condition we find by integrating (1) over an infinitesimal interval t \in (t&#039;-0^+,t&#039;+0^+), leading to the condition on the jump of the first derivative:

\partial_t G(t&#039;+0^+,t&#039;)-\partial_t G(t&#039;-0^+,t&#039;)=\partial_t G(t&#039;+0^+,t&#039;)=\partial_t g(t&#039;+0+,t&#039;) \stackrel{!}{=} 1. \qquad (4)

Plugging (3) and (4) in (2) leads to

A+B=0, \quad A-B=\frac{1}{\mathrm{i} \omega_0} \; \Rightarrow A=-B=\frac{1}{2 \mathrm{i} \omega_0}.

This finally gives

G(t,t&#039;)=\Theta(t-t&#039;) \frac{\sin(\omega_0 t)}{\omega_0}.
 
The equation is just "force = mass x acceleration", and positive force and positive accleration are in the same direction.

When you solve "elementary" questions in dynamics by you can often draw a diagram which measures individual forces, displacements, accelerations, etc as positive in any directions you like, and then figure out the correct equations by looking at the diagram

In more advanced work it is much easier to use the same coordinate system for everything.
That is why the force from the spring is -kx measured in the same coordinate system as x, in this equation.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top