Forces acting on a ring. (Help with direction)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the unknown force acting on a ring in equilibrium, given three coplanar forces. The calculated magnitude of the unknown force is 351 N, but there is confusion regarding its direction. The correct angle for the unknown force is 71.7 degrees, and to find the opposite direction, 180 degrees must be added, resulting in 251.7 degrees relative to the x-axis. Participants clarify that the angle should be referenced from the x-axis to avoid confusion. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly visualizing angles to solve equilibrium problems accurately.
RocketSurgery
Messages
115
Reaction score
3
1. Problem: The following coplanar forces pull on a ring: 200 N at 30 degrees, 500N at 80 degrees, 300N at 240 Degrees, and an unknown force. Find the magnitude and direction of the unknown force for the ring if the ring is in equilibrium.

2. Solution(So Far): Using the line 0 Degrees as the x-axis and 90 Degrees as the y-axis I got 351 N for the force (correct according to the book) however I am unable to find what angle it should be at. For the angle I got 71.7 Degrees [The book lists the answer as 71.7+180=351]. After seeing this answer I thought about it and I understand turning it 90 Degrees but why 180 degrees?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you find the force to be 351 N at 71.7 degrees? Did you add the three given forces to get that answer? If so, remember the unknown force must be equal and opposite to that sum in order to produce equilibrium. To find the direction opposite to an angle, add 180 degrees. (Not 90!)
RocketSurgery said:
[The book lists the answer as 71.7+180=351].
I presume this is a typo on your part?
 
No the book lists the answer as 351 N is that wrong? I understand why the angle needs to be opposite but is the force also wrong? If you mean the direction of the vector than that is what they asked for the angle for.

I know you need to add 180 to put it in equilibrium. I added 90 because it was 71.7 relative to the y-axis instead of relative to the x-axis so the angle with respect to the x-axis is 161.7 so I got confused (I should have drew my diagram with all angles w/respect to the x-axis).
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top