Forces and Power: 18.5 HP to Drive 2320 kg Auto at 62.0 km/h

  • Thread starter Thread starter odie5533
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the forces and power required to drive a 2320 kg automobile at 62.0 km/h. For part A, the total retarding force is derived using the formula F = P/v, resulting in approximately 0.3498 N. In part B, the necessary power to drive the car up a 15% grade is calculated, yielding 77 HP. The initial calculations were critiqued, with suggestions to correctly apply the formulas for accurate results. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying physics principles to solve the problem.
odie5533
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(A) If 18.5 HP are required to drive a 2320 kg automobile at 62.0 km/h on a level road, what is the total retarding force due to friction, air resistance, and so on?
(B) What power is necessary to drive the car at 62.0 km/h up a 15% grade (a hill rising 15.0m vertically in 100m horizontally).

The Attempt at a Solution


18.5 HP = 13795 W
62.0 km/h = 17 m/s
A) P = F*v
P / v = F
F = ma
P / v = ma
a = P / (v * m)
13795 / (17 * 2320) = 0.3498N
B) \alpha = arctan(15/100) = 8.53
\sum F = F_{up} - 0.3498N - w sin(8.530)
\sum F = F_{up} - 0.3498N - 3375N
F_{up} = 3375N
P = F * v
P = 3375 * 17 = 57375 W = 77 HP

This seems completely wrong to me... I'm not sure if any of it is right even. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your part a) isn't right. You had the right formula, but didn't use it. F = P/v.

plug in P plug in v. get F.

Part b), your work is right... you just need to use the correct force from part a).
 
Thanks learningphysics! I had no idea I was so close to the answer, I figured all my work was wrong :(
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top