Forces Concerning a Rectangular Prism

In summary, the conversation discusses the force exerted by a pivot on a rectangular object attached to a wall, as it is released and swings. The moment of inertia of the rectangle is used to calculate its motion, and the torque around the pivot point is calculated to determine the force exerted by the pivot. Two methods are suggested, both of which are equivalent, and the relationship between linear and angular acceleration is also discussed.
  • #1
hyperddude
15
0

Homework Statement


I'm wondering this for any object with moment of inertia I, but I'll ask this question for a rectangle for simplicity and I'm sure I can extend it to general objects.

Say we have a rectangular object (with mass m, height h, and width L) that is attached to a wall by some sort of point support exactly at its corner. If we hold it horizontally then let it go and swing, what is the force that the support exerts on the ruler from right after we let go as it swings? Here's a picture:

nF9ms.png

Homework Equations


Moment of inertia of this rectangle: [itex]\frac{m(h^2 + w^2)}{12} + m((h/2)^2+(w/2)^2) = \frac{m(h^2+w^2)}{3}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I was thinking about concentrating the mass into a point mass at the location of the rectangle's center of mass. This would be like a simple pendulum with starting position at angle [itex]θ[/itex] below the horizontal, where [itex]θ=\tan^{-1}(h/w)[/itex]. There would be a force of mg downward, which has a component of mg*sin(θ) in the direction of swinging and a component of mg*cos(θ) pulling on the "string" of the pendulum. The force that the support supplies, in return, would be opposite to and equal in magnitude to this pull. I'm not so sure this is correct though...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Try calculating the torque around the pivot point.
 
  • #3
Nugatory said:
Try calculating the torque around the pivot point.

To do this, I'm thinking that the "lever arm" is the the line segment from the pivot point to the center of mass. The force due to gravity perpendicular to this lever arm is mg*sin(θ), as stated in my first post. So, the torque should be [itex]L(mg\sin{θ})[/itex] where [itex]L = \sqrt{h^2 + w^2}[/itex] and [itex]θ=\tan^{-1}(h/w)[/itex].

How does this help me find the force exerted by the support at the pivot point though?
 
  • #4
Say we have a rectangular object (with mass m, height h, and width L) that is attached to a wall by some sort of point support exactly at its corner.

Won't the edge foul the wall?

You say it has moment of inertia I so do you understand the calculation of moments of inertia?

Nugatory has offered a method that uses the same approach.
 
  • #5
Woops, [itex]θ=\tan^{-1}(w/h)[/itex], not [itex]h/w[/itex].

With the moment of inertia, I can figure out the motion of this rectangle. How does that relate to the force that the pivot supplies? Does it supply a force equal to the component of the force of gravity on the rectangle, that is perpendicular to the component in the direction of the swinging motion?
 
  • #6
hyperddude said:
How does that relate to the force that the pivot supplies? Does it supply a force equal to the component of the force of gravity on the rectangle, that is perpendicular to the component in the direction of the swinging motion?
A component of the pivot's force will certainly do that. What we know about the initial motion of the centre of mass of the ruler is that it will maintain a constant distance from the pivot. The net force in that radial (diagonal) direction is therefore zero. But the force from the pivot will also have a component perpendicular to that radial line. Together with the corresponding component from gravity this will provide the torque necessary for the angular acceleration. Relating the angular acceleration to the linear one should give you enough equations to solve it.
Calculating the torque around the pivot point also works. That gives you the angular acceleration, and the linear acceleration to add to that must be that which holds the pivot point still. Then you can figure out what force at the pivot point when combined with gravity produces that linear acceleration. The two methods are equivalent.
 
  • #7
Studiot said:
Won't the edge foul the wall?
Presumably the wall is behind the ruler, not next to it.
 
  • #8
haruspex said:
A component of the pivot's force will certainly do that. What we know about the initial motion of the centre of mass of the ruler is that it will maintain a constant distance from the pivot. The net force in that radial (diagonal) direction is therefore zero. But the force from the pivot will also have a component perpendicular to that radial line. Together with the corresponding component from gravity this will provide the torque necessary for the angular acceleration. Relating the angular acceleration to the linear one should give you enough equations to solve it.
Calculating the torque around the pivot point also works. That gives you the angular acceleration, and the linear acceleration to add to that must be that which holds the pivot point still. Then you can figure out what force at the pivot point when combined with gravity produces that linear acceleration. The two methods are equivalent.

So does the linear acceleration (from the pivot, I assume) contribute to the angular acceleration from gravity? I don't quite see how they are related.
 
  • #9
hyperddude said:
So does the linear acceleration (from the pivot, I assume) contribute to the angular acceleration from gravity? I don't quite see how they are related.
There isn't "linear acceleration from the pivot". There's a force from the pivot. The ruler as a whole undergoes some angular acceleration α. The centre also undergoes a linear acceleration a. The instantaneous linear acceleration of any other point on the ruler is then given by the vector expression a+α×r, where r is the vector position relative to the centre. At the pivot, this must equate to 0.
The two aspects of movement result from two forces, gravity and the force at the pivot, acting together.
I didn't really understand your question, so it's hard to guess whether I've answered it.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
There isn't "linear acceleration from the pivot". There's a force from the pivot. The ruler as a whole undergoes some angular acceleration α. The centre also undergoes a linear acceleration a. The instantaneous linear acceleration of any other point on the ruler is then given by the vector expression a+α×r, where r is the vector position relative to the centre. At the pivot, this must equate to 0.
The two aspects of movement result from two forces, gravity and the force at the pivot, acting together.
I didn't really understand your question, so it's hard to guess whether I've answered it.

My question was what the force from the pivot was. You mentioned in a previous post that there would be a component acting in the radial direction (thus making the net force in the radial direction 0). What about perpendicular to the radius?

The instantaneous linear acceleration of any other point on the ruler is then given by the vector expression a+α×r, where r is the vector position relative to the centre. At the pivot, this must equate to 0.

Does that mean the component of the pivot's force perpendicular to the radius is 0?
 
  • #11
You are basically considering a physical pendulum here. You do have circular motion of the cm about the pivot point. It seems you are particularly interested in the radial acceleration of the pendulum which will then enable you to evaluate the force.
 
  • #12
Basic_Physics said:
You are basically considering a physical pendulum here. You do have circular motion of the cm about the pivot point. It seems you are particularly interested in the radial acceleration of the pendulum which will then enable you to evaluate the force.

By radial, you mean in the direction of the radius, right? Is that the only thing I need to consider in finding the force by the pivot?
 
  • #13
hyperddude said:
My question was what the force from the pivot was. You mentioned in a previous post that there would be a component acting in the radial direction (thus making the net force in the radial direction 0). What about perpendicular to the radius?
As I wrote previously
the force from the pivot will also have a component perpendicular to that radial line. Together with the corresponding component from gravity this will provide the torque necessary for the angular acceleration.​
I feel it will become clearer if you just go ahead and develop the usual equations.
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
I feel it will become clearer if you just go ahead and develop the usual equations.

Alright.

The torque due to the component of gravity perpendicular to the radius is [itex]mgL\sin{θ}[/itex]. Since [itex]\sin{θ}=\frac{w}{\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}[/itex] and [itex]L=\frac{\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}{2}[/itex], the torque is therefore [itex]\frac{mgw}{2}[/itex].

This torque is equal to [itex]Iα[/itex] and [itex]I=\frac{m(w^2+h^2)}{3}[/itex]. So, [itex]α=\frac{3gw}{2(w^2+h^2)}[/itex].

[itex]a = αL = \frac{3gw}{2(w^2+h^2)}*\frac{\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}{2}[/itex]

[itex]=\frac{3gw}{4\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}[/itex]

The acceleration from gravity, [itex]g\sin{θ}=\frac{gw}{\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}[/itex] is larger than [itex]a[/itex] found just above! So, I'm thinking that the pivot supplies a force in the opposite direction to make the net acceleration [itex]α=\frac{3gw}{4(w^2+h^2)}[/itex]

This force is [itex]m(\frac{gw}{\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}-\frac{3gw}{4(w^2+h^2)})=\frac{mgw}{4\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}[/itex]

So, my conclusion is that the force from the pivot is in two components: the first is in the radial direction (which makes the radial net force 0). This force has a magnitude of [itex]\frac{mgh}{\sqrt{h^2+w^2}}[/itex], which is the radial component of force due to gravity.

The other component is perpendicular to the previous component. This was found to be [itex]\frac{mgw}{4\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}[/itex].

Is my thinking correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
hyperddude said:
The torque due to the component of gravity perpendicular to the radius is [itex]mgL\sin{θ}[/itex]. Since [itex]\sin{θ}=\frac{w}{\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}[/itex] and [itex]L=\frac{\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}{4}[/itex], the torque is therefore [itex]\frac{mgw}{4}[/itex].
A divisor of 2 has become 4 in there somewhere.
It's easier just to say the line of action of mg is distance w/2 from the pivot, so the moment is mgw/2.
This torque is equal to [itex]Iα[/itex] and [itex]I=\frac{m(w^2+h^2)}{3}[/itex]. So, [itex]α=\frac{3gw}{16(w^2+h^2)}[/itex].
2, not 16.
[itex]a = αL = \frac{3gw}{4(w^2+h^2)}*\frac{\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}{4}[/itex]

[itex]=\frac{3gw}{16\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}[/itex]
4, not 16.
The acceleration from gravity, [itex]g\sin{θ}=\frac{gw}{\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}[/itex] is larger than [itex]a[/itex] found just above! So, I'm thinking that the pivot supplies a force in the opposite direction to make the net acceleration [itex]α=\frac{3gw}{16(w^2+h^2)}[/itex]

This force is [itex]m(\frac{gw}{\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}-\frac{3gw}{16(w^2+h^2)})=\frac{13gw}{16\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}[/itex]

So, my conclusion is that the force from the pivot is in two components: the first is in the radial direction (which makes the radial net force 0). This force has a magnitude of [itex]\frac{mgh}{\sqrt{h^2+w^2}}[/itex], which is the radial component of force due to gravity.

The other component is perpendicular to the previous component. This was found to be [itex]\frac{13mgw}{16\sqrt{w^2+h^2}}[/itex].

Is my thinking correct?

The noted numerical errors aside, yes.
 
  • #16
Oh, good catch. No wonder the rest of my problem wasn't working out. Thanks!
 

FAQ: Forces Concerning a Rectangular Prism

What is a rectangular prism?

A rectangular prism is a three-dimensional shape with six rectangular faces, where each face meets at perpendicular angles.

What are the forces acting on a rectangular prism?

The forces acting on a rectangular prism include gravity, normal force, and any external forces applied to the prism.

How do you calculate the weight of a rectangular prism?

To calculate the weight of a rectangular prism, you can use the formula weight = mass x gravitational acceleration. The mass of the prism can be found by multiplying the density of the material by the volume of the prism.

How does the shape of a rectangular prism affect the forces acting on it?

The shape of a rectangular prism affects the distribution of forces acting on it. For example, a taller prism may experience more gravitational force due to its weight, while a wider prism may experience more normal force due to its surface area.

How can you change the forces acting on a rectangular prism?

You can change the forces acting on a rectangular prism by altering its mass, shape, or the external forces applied to it. For example, adding weight to the prism will increase the gravitational force acting on it, while changing its orientation can change the direction and magnitude of the forces.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
446
Replies
97
Views
4K
Back
Top