Forces & Friction: Calculating Normal Force & Horizontal Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter santoki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the normal force and horizontal force required to accelerate a crate across a level floor. The normal force acting on the 40.0 kg crate is correctly calculated as 392 N, based on the formula N = mg. However, the horizontal force needed to achieve an acceleration of 2.0 m/s² was miscalculated, with the correct value being 312 N, which is not listed among the provided options. Participants emphasized the importance of understanding the distinction between horizontal and vertical forces, clarifying that the normal force is vertical. The conversation highlights the necessity of using free body diagrams to accurately analyze forces in physics problems.
santoki
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A man is pulling a 40.0 kg crate across a level floor with a horizontal force, and the coefficient of kinetic friction is μk = 0.59 for the crate and the floor.

14. What is the normal force acting on the box?
a) 231 N
b) 340 N
c) 196 N
d) 392 N

15. What horizontal force must the man apply to get the crate to accelerate at 2.0 m/s2 ?
a) 311 N
b) 231 N
c) 81 N
d) 40 N

2. The attempt at a solution

For 14:
N = mg = (40.0)(9.8) = 392N

For 15:
N-Fx = max
392 - Fx = (40.0)(2.0)
Fx = 312N

but there's no 312N there and I didn't even incorporate the μk?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you draw a free body diagram? Is N a horizontal force or a vertical force?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Did you draw a free body diagram? Is N a horizontal force or a vertical force?

Chet

N is a horizontal force.
 
santoki said:
N is a horizontal force.

No, it's a vertical force, the vertical component of the reaction from the floor.
What, then, is the frictional force?
What is the relationship between the frictional force, the applied force, and the resulting acceleration? (Your equation was wrong.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top