Found a Planck value that relates to classical gravity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the exploration of a potential relationship between Planck values and classical gravity, specifically through the lens of an 8-dimensional N-Sphere form. Devin Wintch presented equations involving the Planck Constant and gravitational constant, suggesting a connection to magnetic resonance imaging values. However, the consensus among participants is that the findings lack scientific validity and are dismissed as numerology rather than legitimate physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck Constant and its significance in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with gravitational constant (G) and its role in classical physics
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis, particularly in higher dimensions
  • Basic principles of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its relation to physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Planck Constant in quantum mechanics
  • Study the mathematical foundations of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Explore the principles of magnetic resonance imaging and its physical underpinnings
  • Investigate the distinction between legitimate scientific inquiry and numerology in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and enthusiasts of physics, particularly those interested in quantum mechanics and classical gravity, as well as anyone seeking to differentiate between valid scientific theories and pseudoscientific claims.

Devin553344
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was researching the Planck Constant values and decided to build a math software to scan for potential values that relate to permittivity of free space and permeability of free space and found one of the 2010 CODATA values (specifically the Magnetic Resonance Imaging value). Can I get some feedback on whether it may relate to actual physics? I'm still new to physics and studying quantum and classical concepts. The following relates to an 8 dimensional N-Sphere form:

h2=4πc2 16/625 1/3π4(ε/π2)7

so that h=6.626 0724(80)e-34 which matches the magnetic resonance value from the Wikipedia page on "Planck Constant"

so that a gravity relates to Planck:

G=625/16 (1/3π4μ7)/(hc2μ2)

so that G=6.674 06(09)e-11

And together they make a 4 dimensional to 8 or 6 dimensional form:
G=1/(2π2(h/2π)3) x (ε)2/(3π3c5)2

The question is whether there is anything to those equations, I've been staring at them for months now and unsure what I'm looking at but don't want to just throw them away if there is some correctness to them? Thanks, Devin Wintch
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Devin553344 said:
The question is whether there is anything to those equations
No, that's numerology. Look long enough and you can find lots of numbers that are similar.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander and Dale

Similar threads

Undergrad The new definition of kg and the mass-energy equivalence
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Undergrad The standard model from loop quantum gravity via spinors octonions
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
Undergrad About fundamental constants and vacuum
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Undergrad Two recent tests of loop quantum gravity theory
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Undergrad Can Core Theory Be Derived From Nine Lines?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Undergrad Atmospheric Density vs Altitude in an O'Neil Cylinder
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
High School Understanding Planck Mass and Gravity Formula for the Hierarchy Problem
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Graduate Can an event horizon telescope observe quantum gravity effects
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Comparing Planck's Mass, Length, Time and Energy
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Undergrad Asymptotic safety and loop quantum gravity
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K