Four Vector Analysis: Calculating Particle Velocity and Ratio in Particle Decay

AI Thread Summary
In the decay of a particle with rest mass Mo into three identical particles of rest mass mo, the velocities of the first two particles are given, allowing for the calculation of the third particle's speed and direction. Using four vector analysis, the initial particle's four vector is (Mo, 0, 0, 0), while the final particles' energies are derived from energy conservation principles. The speed of particle 3 is calculated to be 0.98 times the speed of light, moving in the opposite direction to particle 2. Additionally, the ratio of the rest masses is determined to be Mo/mo = 5, indicating that the initial particle's mass is five times greater than that of each decay product. This analysis illustrates the application of four vectors in particle decay scenarios.
sevs
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A particle of rest mass Mo is at rest in the laboratory when it decays into three identical particles, each of rest mass mo. Two of the particles (1 and 2) have velocities and directions as shown. [1 is 3c/5 at -90degrees, 2 4c/5 at 180degrees]
(a) Calculate the direction and the speed of particle 3.
(b) Find the ratio Mo/mo=

what's a four vector? how would you use one to solve part (a)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With no intentions of going into complicated differential geometry,a four vector is a vector of a four-dimensional vector/linear space.The expression "4vector" is used for vectors (covariant/contravariant) from a flat/curved Minkowski space called "space-time".
 


A four vector is a mathematical tool used in special relativity to describe the properties of a particle, including its position, momentum, and energy. It is represented by a four-dimensional vector with components (ct, x, y, z), where c is the speed of light and t, x, y, and z represent time and spatial coordinates.

To solve part (a) of the problem, we can use a four vector analysis. The four vector for the initial particle (Mo) can be written as (Mo, 0, 0, 0), since it is at rest in the laboratory. The four vector for the three identical particles after the decay can be written as (mo, E1, E2, E3), where E1, E2, and E3 represent the energies of particles 1, 2, and 3 respectively.

Since the total energy of the system is conserved, we can equate the initial and final four vectors to find the energies of particles 1 and 2: Mo = E1 + E2. Solving for E1 and E2, we get E1 = (3/5)Mo and E2 = (4/5)Mo.

The four vector for particle 3 can then be written as (mo, E1, E2, E3), where E3 is the energy of particle 3. Using the formula for relativistic energy, E = γmc^2, where γ is the Lorentz factor and m is the rest mass, we can calculate the speed of particle 3:

E3 = γmo c^2
E3 = mo c^2 / √(1 - v^2/c^2)
v^2 = (1 - (E3/mo)^2) c^2
v = c √(1 - (mo/Mo)^2)

Substituting the values for mo and Mo, we get v = c √(1 - (1/5)^2) = 0.98c. This means that particle 3 is moving at a speed of 0.98 times the speed of light, in a direction opposite to particle 2.

To solve part (b) of the problem, we can use the ratio of the rest masses of the initial and final particles: Mo/mo = 5. This means that the rest mass of the initial particle is five times greater than
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top