Myself and a user on another board have come to the following hurdle we can't overcome:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Mathematically we represent an arbiarty matter wave as a superposition of plane waves; using the theory of Fourier analysis. We can write an arbitary wavepacked as a Fourier integral of the form:

[tex]$\psi (x,t) = \frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\pi } }}\int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {A(p_x )e^{\frac{i}{\hbar }(p_x x - Et)} dP_x } $

[/tex]

What this means is we can mathematically constuct a localised complace wavefunction by adding up (integrating) a large number of plane waves each with different momentum. The relaive amplitde of the component waves is determined by the function A(p[x]) which is given by:

[tex]$A(p_x ) = \frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\pi } }}\int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {\psi (x,t)e^{\frac{i}{\hbar }(p_x x - Et)} dx} $

[/tex]

The functions psi(x,t) and A(p[x])) are called Fourier transofrms of one another.

How could we use this practically? Isn't there a circular argument there? To get teh amplitudes, we need the wavefunction, but to get teh wavefunction we need the amplitudes. The only answer I could give was that the amplitudes may fall naturally out of the system being studied. However having not 'offically' studied Fourier series before, is there a simpiler explanation?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Fourier Analysis in QM

Loading...

Similar Threads for Fourier Analysis |
---|

A Stochastic signal analysis in QM |

I Normalization and the probability amplitude |

I Negative and Positive energy modes of KG equation |

I Fourier conjugates and momentum |

I 'Normalisation' of Fourier Transforms in QFT |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**