Fourier Intergrals and transforms

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brewer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier
AI Thread Summary
To evaluate the Fourier integral F(ω) = (1/√(2π))∫ e^(-αt)cos(ωt) dt from 0 to infinity, integration by parts is not suitable due to the limits. Instead, using the substitution cos(u) = (e^(iu) + e^(-iu))/2 simplifies the integral into the sum of two exponential integrals. This approach makes the problem more manageable and reveals that the Fourier integral is less complex than initially anticipated. Understanding Fourier integrals is crucial as they connect time and frequency domains, providing insights into signal processing and other applications. The discussion highlights the importance of substitution techniques in evaluating integrals effectively.
Brewer
Messages
203
Reaction score
0
How do I do a Fourier integral (and what's the point of them??)

I've been asked to evaluate

F(\omega) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int dte^{-\alpha t}cos\omega t

and I've not the foggiest idea what to do. I thought I could just go about doing in the integral by parts (limits are 0 and infinity by the way), but on further research I don't think I can do that can I?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try integration by parts.
 
cos(u)=(exp(iu)+exp(-iu))/2

Substitute into your integral and you will have the sum of two exp integrals. I presume you can do that.
 
Yes that's familliar. I have done this integral before - just never dawned on me to use the substitution.

I was also a little confused when it called it a Fourier Integral. I thought it was going to be a lot more complex than it appears to be now.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top