Fourier Series and the Riemann-Zeta Function

MaGG
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the Fourier series technique to show that the following series sum to the quantities shown:
\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^4}=\frac{\pi^4}{90}
1+\frac{1}{3^2}+\frac{1}{5^2}+...=\frac{\pi^2}{8}

Homework Equations


I know the Riemann-Zeta function is
\zeta (m)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^m}

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first series, I know that it's the evaluation of \zeta (4). The problem is getting the derivation down. I've found an example of it being solved and proven at \zeta (2) here: http://planetmath.org/?op=getobj&from=objects&name=ValueOfTheRiemannZetaFunctionAtS2 . The problem is, I don't really understand what to define as the initial function f(x).

For the second series, I think I've found it to be:
\frac{1}{(2n-1)^2}
After that, I don't know how to go about solving it using the Fourier method. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By "Fourier series technique", do you mean expand the 1/n4 or the 1/(2n - 1)2 into its Fourier series?
 
A general method appears in the paper 'Recursive Formulas for \zeta(2k)[/tex] and L(2k-1)[/tex]' by Xuming Chen.<br /> <br /> Generally, try f(x) = x^{2k}[/tex] for your function (an even one on x here) in a Fourier expansion to get \zeta(2k)[/tex], and consider the derivative of the expansion to get L(2k-1)[/tex] (the L function here is the analogue of the Riemann zeta on odd numbers only).
 
but still you ll not express

\zeta(2k+1)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top