Fourier transform from k-space to x

jmm5872
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I have calculated a k-space function to be f(k) = \frac{1}{2k}

I want to Fourier transform this to find f(x), I have found many different Fourier transform equations...can I use this one?

f(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2π}}\int\frac{1}{2k}e-ikxdk Limits fo integration -Infinity to Infinity

I'm also having trouble remembering my complex analysis, would I use residue theorem for this integral? I don't quite remember exactly how that goes...

∫f(z) = 2πiRes(f,z0) Correct?

The residue for f(k) is 1/2, so I am not sure excatly what the answer means? Or if I am using residue theorem correctly?

Final answer: f(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2π}}2πi(1/2) = \sqrt{\frac{π}{2}}i
This doesn't make sense as an answer.

Thanks,
Jason
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jmm5872 said:
I have calculated a k-space function to be f(k) = \frac{1}{2k}

I want to Fourier transform this to find f(x), I have found many different Fourier transform equations...can I use this one?

f(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2π}}\int\frac{1}{2k}e-ikxdk Limits fo integration -Infinity to Infinity

I'm also having trouble remembering my complex analysis, would I use residue theorem for this integral? I don't quite remember exactly how that goes...

∫f(z) = 2πiRes(f,z0) Correct?

The residue for f(k) is 1/2, so I am not sure excatly what the answer means? Or if I am using residue theorem correctly?

Final answer: f(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2π}}2πi(1/2) = \sqrt{\frac{π}{2}}i
This doesn't make sense as an answer.

Thanks,
Jason

The issue with your calculation is that you seem to have forgotten that the residue theorem applies when the contour you are integrating over completely encircles a pole in the complex plane. What you calculated is the integral over a contour around the point k = 0. The integral you want to calculate is

$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty dk~\frac{e^{-ikx}}{k},$$
so you need a closed contour, at least one piece of which runs along the real axis while avoiding the pole at k = 0. One typically skirts around the pole with a semi-circular arc of small radius ##\epsilon##, and then closes the contour with an arc of radius R, either in the upper half plane or the lower half plane. One takes ##R \rightarrow \infty## and ##\epsilon \rightarrow 0## at the end of the calculation.

There are a number of important things to note about such a contour: 1) the pole is not enclosed by it, so the full contour integral is zero; the integrals along the segments of the contour thus sum to zero. 2) Which half-plane (negative or positive) you close the large arc in will depend on whether or not x is positive or negative.

Have you computed a contour integral like this before? Give it a shot and see what you find.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top