Fourier Transform: Solve Homework Equations for fd

Lengalicious
Messages
162
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


See Attachment


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so in a previous question I worked out fd = e-ipd*2*sinc(pa)/√(2∏), also worked out its Fourier transform if that helps.

Now I really am stuck on the question, any guidance would be appreciated, I don't understand how the function fd is summed over from -N to N, like I say any help to just send me in the right direction would be great.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    12.8 KB · Views: 544
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem suggests that the function fd should be a function of x, but I don't see an x in your expression.
 
MisterX said:
The problem suggests that the function fd should be a function of x, but I don't see an x in your expression.

Well the original function was f(x) which was a function of x that I then Fourier transformed with limits of x =-a to x=a, this replaced the x's with a's. fd(x) was then a slight variation of the original f(x) function, ultimately I ended up with said function where fd(x) = f(x - d) which transforms to e(-ipd)*f(p) where f(p) was the Fourier transform of f(x).
 
I made an issue with the question, not sure how to edit. Anyway f_d(x) = 1/a when |x-d|< a. What I said in the 1st post is actually the Fourier transform of this.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top