Fourier transformation of the Wavefunction in QM

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the Fourier transformation of a wavefunction defined piecewise. The wavefunction is given as zero outside the interval [-L, L] and constant A_0 within it. The Fourier transform is calculated using the integral of the wavefunction multiplied by the exponential function, which shifts the dependence from position x to momentum k. A participant initially misinterprets the result of the integral, mistakenly treating the output as a function of x instead of k. Clarification is provided that the correct result should reflect dependence on k, not x.
B4cklfip
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Given is the function phi(x) = A_0 for -L≤x≤L and phi(x) = 0 otherwise.
The task is to first sketch phi(x) as function of x. Then to calculate the fourier-transformation and sketch phi(k) as function of kL. Also I have to compare accessible Broads.
Relevant Equations
phi(k)=1/sqrt(2*pi) integral_-inf_inf (dx exp(i*k*x)*phi(x))
Hello Physics Forum,

I am not sure what to to in this task, because the wavefunction is only given as A_0. Maybe someone can explain it to me.

Thanks in Advance,
B4ckflip
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It says in your problem statement that <br /> \phi(x) = \begin{cases} 0 &amp; x &lt; -L \\<br /> A_0 &amp; -L \leq x \leq L \\<br /> 0 &amp; x &gt; L\end{cases}. So what is <br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{ikx} \phi(x)\,dx?
 
\phi(k) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{ikx} \phi(x)\,dx

is the Fouriertransformation of \phi(x). It changes the dependence of the wavefunction from position x to momentum p.
 
And how would you do the integral, given that \phi(x) is defined piecewise?
 
Thanks for the hint, I now tried to solve it and got following result:

$$\tilde{\phi}(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & x < -L \\ \frac{A_0}{\sqrt{2pi}k} \cdot 2sin(kL)\ & -L \leq x \leq L \\ 0 & x > L\end{cases}$$

I have integrated from -L to L for the second interval. Is it correct ?
And how can I sketch specially phi(x) ?
 
B4cklfip said:
Thanks for the hint, I now tried to solve it and got following result:

$$\tilde{\phi}(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & x < -L \\ \frac{A_0}{\sqrt{2pi}k} \cdot 2sin(kL)\ & -L \leq x \leq L \\ 0 & x > L\end{cases}$$

I have integrated from -L to L for the second interval. Is it correct?
No, it's not correct. Note that you integrated with respect to ##x##, so ##x## doesn't appear in the final result once you plug the limits in. ##\tilde{\phi}## is not a function of ##x## but of ##k##.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top