FPGA speeds and recommendations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Okefenokee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fpga
AI Thread Summary
FPGAs can indeed process data at 48 MHz, suitable for DSP applications like video compression, but achieving this speed may depend on the specific processing tasks involved. While programming FPGAs typically requires specialized hardware like dongles, it is possible to load VHDL programs using a microcontroller with the right code. Altera and Xilinx are recommended brands, with Altera's Cyclone IV being noted for its affordability and high clock rates, though it lacks an internal oscillator and requires external components for configuration. Free development tools are available, such as Quartus from Altera, which includes simulation capabilities. Overall, Altera appears to be a strong choice for those needing good documentation and support for video DSP projects.
Okefenokee
Messages
245
Reaction score
13
I don't know much about FPGA's but I think I need one for a pet project. I had a few questions for any Verilog pros.

Do they make them fast enough to process bytes at 48 MHz (DSP basically). I'm sure they do make them somewhere but can you get one cheap?

Can you load a VHDL program to an FPGA using an ordinary microcontroller or do FPGA's need special hardware setups for flashing them? Most tutorials I've been looking at require programming dongles. That's fine for software development but I'd like to put one a board of my own making eventually.

Can anyone recommend a brand? I'm looking for one that has really good documentation including board layouts, programming timing diagrams, recommended components, large selection, free development tools, etc.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Okefenokee said:
I don't know much about FPGA's but I think I need one for a pet project. I had a few questions for any Verilog pros.

Do they make them fast enough to process bytes at 48 MHz (DSP basically). I'm sure they do make them somewhere but can you get one cheap?

Can you load a VHDL program to an FPGA using an ordinary microcontroller or do FPGA's need special hardware setups for flashing them? Most tutorials I've been looking at require programming dongles. That's fine for software development but I'd like to put one a board of my own making eventually.


48MHz is a pretty slow clock speed for FPGAs, but it depends on the nature of your "processing" (can you elaborate, is it just multiply-accumulates?)

You can load FPGA from microcontroller, but you will have to write/obtain the necessary code. Dongles are generally used to allow FPGA programming during development/debug (eliminating the software dependency).


Okefenokee said:
Can anyone recommend a brand? I'm looking for one that has really good documentation including board layouts, programming timing diagrams, recommended components, large selection, free development tools, etc.

There are only a handful. Go to Wikipedia page for FPGA, they are listed at bottom. They all have good documentation. Development tools may be your issue. You may want to focus on this first. I believe that the major FPGA vendors (Xilinx/Altera) only give this out for free to large customers.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The DSP I'm talking about is going to be video compression. Basically I want to make a barebones codec with very little compression so that you can receive a video feed with extremely low latency. The FPGA would package pixel data coming in at 48MHz into packets and send that to a microcontroller with IP capability.

I'm not sure what kind of FPGA I should go for. Is there free software out there for Verilog? It would be cool if I could write what I want and get reports on what kind of hardware I need to realize it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know where you are located but here in the UK you can get an Altera Cyclone IV FPGA for about £15, which has a maximum clock rate of 472.5MHz. However, there are a few disadvantages when you use an FPGA in your circuit:
  • An FPGA doesn't have an internal oscillator. You need to use an oscillator chip or make your own oscillator.
  • The core voltage for the Cyclone IV, for example, is between 1.15V and 1.25V and the maximum output voltage for the IO banks is 3.3V.
  • Altera's FPGAs do not have internal FLASH. You need an external FLASH chip to store the configuration data. On power up the FPGA loads the configuration data. You can download your code on the FLASH chip through the parallel cable. The FLASH can be connected in various ways to the FPGA e.g. parallel, SPI etc.

I am familiar only with Altera's devices. You can download the free version of Quartus from their webside, which includes a free version of ModelSim for simulation.

P.S.
The clock rate of the FPGA is somewhat misleading. This is the maximum rate for the D-type flip-flops but if your delay is longer, you need to decrease your clock rate. Generally, if you need to increase the speed of the encoding, you will put more parallel blocks together. I can give you some advice, if you post what you want to do exactly.

Edit
See Figure 8-6 on page 20 here. Also on pages 4 and 5 you can see the configuration file size.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks very much for your replies. It looks like Altera is the way to go. They have video DSP libraries and tables that show the DSP performance on their different core families. I'm checking out their software.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top