Free body diagram, bearing forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating reaction forces in a free body diagram involving a gear with tangential and radial forces acting on bearings. The user has derived the reaction forces in both the X-Y and X-Z planes but seeks clarification on the torque generated by the tangential force. It is established that the torque, calculated as T = r*Ft, creates a torsional moment reaction at the bearings. If the bearings cannot withstand the torque, the gear will rotate. Understanding the direction of this torque is crucial for accurately modifying the reaction forces.
Kalus
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I wish to work out the reaction forces on the following diagram:

[PLAIN]http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/7055/imag0211b.jpg

The circle is a gear with tangential force acting at Ft and radial force acting at Fr.

A and B are bearings that take the Ft and Fr forces.

I have found the reaction forces opposing the downward Fr in the X-Y plane, which are Ay = Fr*(La/L) and By= Fr*(Lb/L)

In the X-Z plane there is the sideways reaction forces due to Ft, which are Az= Ft*(La/L) and By= Ft*(La/L).

Now, I know that is not all that is to it, because the force Ft acts at half the diameter of the gear wheel, producing a torque.

My question is, which direction does that torque go and why? One of the above reaction forces needs to be modified to take this into account.

Many Thanks,

Kalus
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Kalus: By the way, please do not post wide images directly to the forum page. Just post a text link to wide images.

If r is the gear radius, then your applied torque is T = r*Ft. Assuming the bearings at ends A and B are roughly the same, then applied torque T would be reacted by a torsional moment reaction, Mx, about the x axis, at each end A and B, where Mx is approximately, Mx = -0.5*T. But if the ends cannot generate this much torsional resistance, the gear will rotate.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top