Free Body Diagram: Explaining 3 Cord Tensions for Block C

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Free Body Diagram (FBD) of Block C and the confusion surrounding the involvement of three cord tensions. It is clarified that while Block C itself only has two cords directly connected, including the bottom pulley in the system allows for consideration of three tensions. This approach simplifies the analysis, as it avoids the need for a separate FBD for the bottom pulley. Participants agree that either method is valid, depending on the preferred approach to solving the problem. Understanding the system's configuration is key to determining the appropriate FBD representation.
princejan7
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://postimg.org/image/5h0hvdi4l/
Can someone explain why the FBD of Block C would involve three cord tensions?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
princejan7 said:
Can someone explain why the FBD of Block C would involve three cord tensions?
Whoever is claiming that is probably considering the bottom pulley, which is connected to block C, as part of the block C system. Perfectly OK.

But you certainly do not have to! If you consider block C separately, you'll also need a diagram for that bottom pulley.
 
Can someone explain why the FBD of Block C would involve three cord tensions?

It can't. There are only two cords directly connected to block C.

Now, if you were to make a horizontal cut between the two smaller sheaves, you would have the tension in three cords to consider.
 
Doc Al said:
Whoever is claiming that is probably considering the bottom pulley, which is connected to block C, as part of the block C system. Perfectly OK.

But you certainly do not have to! If you consider block C separately, you'll also need a diagram for that bottom pulley.
http://postimg.org/image/oxb74l6t1/

so here they've considered the block + the bottom pulley as the system?
is there any reason for why they did that instead of just considering Block C as the system?
 
princejan7 said:
http://postimg.org/image/oxb74l6t1/

so here they've considered the block + the bottom pulley as the system?
Yes, for the purpose of that FBD they consider 'block + bottom pulley' as a single unit.

is there any reason for why they did that instead of just considering Block C as the system?
Just saves a bit of time. If you just considered Block C alone, you'd have to do another FBD for the bottom pulley to figure out the tension in the cable connecting it to the block. No big deal; either way is fine.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top